Shell reviews pay against the market we compete in for talent, generally targeting upper quartile pay. Has anyone ever seen who Shell benchmarks against?
13 replies (most recent on top)
@17f yep I was told to expect their knowledge to be that of a G grade engineer so I would have to do a bunch of hand holding and training. It was a waste of time honestly.
TAO = technical asset operations or support - chennai, manila, kuala lumpur, bangalore I think. "Efficient" support, cheap labor.
"Efficient" bc my experience has been it takes them 2x to 5x longer to do something ... after asking you how to do it
@bq what is TAO
@cw bingo. The attrition rate is below what they want so conditions will continue to deteriorate.
Shell HR uses Tier 3 scale to benchmark externally but uses Tier 1/standard scale to pay 80% of the US staff.
@ce what’s left of Shell Canada beyond Scotsford and the LNG facility in BC?
@ce either attrition increases or more layoffs, so expect working/pay conditions to get worse to increase attrition. Rip coffee
This is all hypothetical
@at do you know if there are big layoffs coming to Calgary for shell ??
The dark arts of benchmarking can be used to justify absolutely anything.
Think we benchmarked against TAO.
Canada leadership wants people to quit especially in Calgary. No big payouts for layoffs.
Now we will also benchmark outside oil and gas in Canada so we can say we still pay top quartile when they benchmark against lower paying industries….
@OP In Canada, supposedly we get paid well above the average. But who they benchmark against is never revealed.