Thread regarding SAP layoffs

11 replies (most recent on top)

Does anyone have access to the dashboard? It seems like we can see only the general results but not able to see our area or even better, our team results. Isn’t this information should be transparent and available to all employees?

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @17w+1ks5v8qa3

Chuck has 100% approval from his team.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @mx+1ks5v8qa3

Name to watch for 2H 2026 is guy from Hamburg named Klaus Hergersheimer

Turn around specialist. Works with many F500 firms

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @jy+1ks5v8qa3

@em you’re right! But it isn’t going happen soon. Just try to make fun of her instead - There’s a lot of material there, and her poor fashion choices aloce is a decade’s worth of material!

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @ey+1ks5v8qa3

Gina should be laid off. Under her, employee rights have been flushed down in the toilet. But she cannot be laid off because our board wants at least one woman on there to show that they care about women in leadership positions. So they will use her to do as much damage as possible. After all, the supervisory board consists of their lapdogs who won't lift a finger against them and will work hard to give them more and more money every year. It's a really sad state of affairs.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @em+1ks5v8qa3

@ag And what happens when Leadership Trust goes below 50%? Will they reward Christian Klein by giving him €25 million as a bonus instead of €20 million? It's weird that overperforming employees are getting punished and the underperforming executive board, area executives and group executives are minting millions every year.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @d0+1ks5v8qa3

@c5 I think they did not notice that Chuck passed away, and were afraid the board would send him around if they did not provide top marks.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @cb+1ks5v8qa3

@ag 54% is still too high. My guess is that these 54% like being spanked and called tooth plaque by DA.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @c5+1ks5v8qa3

Trust in SAP Exec board is 54%. 5 point drop.
Confidence in strategy is 63%. A drop from 70%.
It appears that the numbers are based on a perentage of total employees not the number of respondents? I might be wrong there though?

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @ag+1ks5v8qa3

Haha the score must be really bad if they chose not to publish this. But it doesn't matter anyway. Even if the trust in leadership goes close to zero, the supervisory board will fight tooth and nail to increase executive bonuses. So the executive board will do whatever they want. So none of these scores really matter.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @aa+1ks5v8qa3

They decided not to publish this. Last time when the score went down, it was discussed a lot in print media. So they removed it and instead are talking about a new score Leadership Index. Leadership Index will always be more than 80% every time. That's because a large component in its calculation is immediate manager score. And because unfiltered is not really anonymous, everyone scores their manager really high. It's a very cunning way of changing the narrative at SAP.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @a2+1ks5v8qa3

Post a reply

: