Thread regarding Edward Jones layoffs

A message for BOAs

If you're able, get licensed and the FPQP designation. I know it seems intimidating but you know more than you think.

Tenured BOAs are being let go through teaming. Remember all that dust we kicked up about our pay? Yeah.

Be prepared.


by
| 2193 views | | 15 replies (last February 24) | Reply
Post ID: @OP+1khk9wxkq

15 replies (most recent on top)

curious, anybody know how many, percentage wise, BOAs are women vs men?

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @1et+1khk9wxkq

@x8 Never had noticed that PP kind of resembles Ghislaine M! Guess it makes sense that they are recruiting younger gals for the FAs.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @1ek+1khk9wxkq

@11m this is true. HO has expectations mostly set of one BOA per three FAs. Mergers = BOAs gone. AFA and RBAs are still mostly safe due to the ability to make transactions in client accounts. Registered and certified BOAs need to move to another CST role to keep their jobs.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @1dk+1khk9wxkq

@11m Also, if you are a BOA who knows what they are doing, have been here longer than 10 yrs, and is over the age of 35, consider yourself high risk of being forced out. They want young, d-mb, cheaply paid boas now that can used as eye candy and will comply with whatever new insane policy penny and her cronies roll out.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @175+1khk9wxkq

Advice: if you are a BOA and hear that your office is "merging," start looking for another job immediately, so you are prepared if they use it later as a way / reason to eliminate your position.

This is a modus operandi they are very confortable using.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @11m+1khk9wxkq

They will use "office mergers" to get rid of BOAs they don't like or get rid of the ones who have critical thinking skills.

An FA who demands total praise (like a narcissus) will get rid of anyone he/she/they don't like or who easily threatens them or.....has more education.

Or even more simply, a chance to bring in the young girls to gawk at all day.

Ageism is alive and well at EJ.

Advice: to keep your job - pretend your d-mb and smile. Question nothing and just nod.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @x8+1khk9wxkq

@kp The partners want MORE

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @kx+1khk9wxkq

As a HO person, yes, tenured BOAs are being kicked to the curb - be prepared.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @kp+1khk9wxkq

@c1 Cutting expense is fine, but doing it to where all your talented, knowledgeable, reliable people leave and are replaced at home office with cheap sloppy indian labor or 21 yr old job hopper boa's, is a recipe for disaster long term. They want to cut what makes the firm function while completely ignoring how much money is wasted on failed marketing, expensive phone booth pods at H.O. and bloated salaries for GP/ELT who literally do nothing productive here. All they do sponge $ and break stuff.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @es+1khk9wxkq

@b5 I'm really sorry for that. I hope you're on to better things

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @c3+1khk9wxkq

@af It doesn't make sense unless the goal is to cut expenses.

I've heard stories and multiple BOAs have posted here about being squeezed out. I fear it will become a trend.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @c1+1khk9wxkq

Dont forget - you can always file with the EEOC when a discriminatory reason is used for the discharge of your job.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @b9+1khk9wxkq

@af With these leaders at the helm, who are unaɓle to managed pragmatically and logicallly, this move makes sense! Having clients pay high fees for inexperience amd youth makes total sense ;-)

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @b7+1khk9wxkq

I can attest to this! Let go after 10 years and was 1 week away from taking my Series 7 when told my job was being eliminated due to a "merger."

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @b5+1khk9wxkq

Why would we push out the tenured senior BOAs? Those people are the glue that hold the branches together.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @af+1khk9wxkq

Post a reply

: