Chevron’s performance in 2024 showed us that while we are still moving forward, it not at the pace we should be.
We generated a total shareholder return (TSR) of 5.4% for 2024, but more telling is the compounded annual TSR of 15.7% over the last three years. In that period, share price appreciation was a significant factor, accounting for 11.5% of the return. This came from acquisitions, buybacks, and private equity, while dividends contributed 4.0%.
But here’s the hard truth: even with these numbers, our performance lags behind our peer group, which averaged a TSR of 25.1%. Why? The simple answer is that our cost structure is too high.
Too many overstaffed departments, inflated budgets, and teams that aren't driving meaningful top-line growth. In fact, some are actively holding us back. We need to reduce structural costs. We need to hold ourselves accountable. This is how we unlock more free cash flow, which is ultimately how we can deliver more value to shareholders.
Here’s where it gets uncomfortable: For many of our nonperforming teams, this shift means less comfort and more responsibility. Some may not like it, and that’s okay. There will be discomfort, relocation, and job loses. But that’s the price of doing business at the level we want to achieve. And frankly, if some people can’t adjust to that reality, like the many IT whiners here, they should EOI and try their luck elsewhere.
This is about making Chevron better, making it more agile, more efficient, and more focused on what matters. I’m glad that MN has the backbone to drive these changes. But there’s a deeper problem here. We have managers, several in the L3 and many in XLT levels, who aren’t pulling their weight. It’s going to take another round or two to root out the inefficiency there and really sharpen our focus on performance.
At the end of the day, this is all for the benefit of Chevron, its employees, and, most importantly, our shareholders. We’ve got work to do. And the time to do it is now.