Thread regarding ExxonMobil Corp. layoffs

KOF 101 for new hires

Some info for new employees: knowledgeable others’ feedback (KOF) does not always reflect true performance. You can have great KOFs but poor ranking outcome and vise versa, depending on internal dynamics.

  • When a manager pressures you to list specific individuals for KOF—especially those unlikely to provide supportive or accurate feedback—it can predetermine the outcome and increase the risk of being rated NI/NSI.
  • In contrast, some employees may be allowed to list observers they barely worked with, and if the manager approves those names, fake great feedback.
  • If someone claims to have mentored or supported you but does not list that you in their own KOF selections, it is often a sign that their feedback may not be protective or aligned with your interests.
  • Managers can access offline or informal feedback channels, and when they insist on certain KOF names, it may indicate they are steering the process toward a specific outcome.

by
| 12 views | | 6 replies (last March 24) | Reply
Post ID: @OP+1kme4b979

6 replies (most recent on top)

It is all rigged. It is a popularity contest foremost. If you are not chosen to sit at the cool kids table you are toast. It is a sick process that only rewards the lowest of humans. Pure sc-m suceeds at ExxonMobil and all others fail. I have seen suposed employee friends stab each other in the back to survive. Reminds me of the squid games.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @c3+1kme4b979

What is said in the session is entirely up to your supervisor. The supervisor can make anything up. No one checks what is said against the KOF and your supervisor has 120 seconds to talk about you. But what really matters more than your supervisor is how many HIPOS are in your rank group. Your supervisor is powerless to do anything other thank put the HIPOS in the top spots. Scraps for everyone else.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @b8+1kme4b979

In our group, the section head copies and pastes the KOFs (removes names) and sends them to you in a priv email. My previous managers summarized them in a note but not this one

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @b7+1kme4b979

King of fighters?

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @az+1kme4b979

@ac This is my first time preparing PDS materials, and I didn’t even have the MAC experience. My understanding is that L4 managers are in ranking discussions with STPs and their L3 managers to run the show and adjust it to scur a sweet spot for themselves L4 managers themselves can also be placed on a PIP? My manager keeps saying he isn’t technical, has limited involvement in day‑to‑day work, and rarely comes to the office, definitely PIP material

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @ae+1kme4b979

As someone who has sat through 5+ years of BS assessment meetings, the most important piece:

Good KOF feedback is unlikely to materially help you, but bad can absolutely ki-l you

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @ac+1kme4b979

Post a reply

: