Thread regarding Nike Inc. layoffs

Dear Nike Board of Directors

Are you reading the posts on this forum? Do you care about the health of this company? As a shareholder, I do. You don’t need to hire a multimillion dollar consulting firm to diagnose the situation and put a plan in place. A rational person and a little GenAI can summarize the themes for you

Key Themes
• Organizational instability: Employees cite constant reorganizations—often every six months—which has created fatigue, confusion, and a sense that structural decisions are being driven by short-term pressures rather than a long-term plan.
• Talent decisions undermining trust: There are repeated concerns that recent layoffs and promotions didn’t align with performance, with high performers cut while lower performers remained due to internal politics or legacy relationships.
• Leadership and HR gaps: Employees point to inconsistent leadership quality, slow or overly procedural HR processes, and communication missteps around sensitive changes. Some comments note ineffective leaders remaining in place despite clear issues.
• Burnout and morale decline: Workloads are heavy, career mobility feels limited, and many employees describe being exhausted and discouraged. Morale appears fragile, and trust in leadership is weakened.
• Impact on innovation: Several threads reference a shift from leading the market to following it. Internal volatility is viewed as slowing decision-making and diluting the creative culture that historically fueled Nike’s brand strength.

Implications
Left unaddressed, these issues create material risks: higher attrition among top performers, slower innovation cycles, reduced productivity, and a culture that becomes increasingly difficult to repair.

Recommendations for Consideration
• Stabilize the organization by pausing major reorgs and aligning on a multi-year structural plan.
• Audit recent layoffs and promotion decisions to rebuild confidence in fairness and performance alignment.
• Strengthen leadership accountability through clearer expectations and more rigorous capability reviews.
• Address burnout by examining workload models, spans of control, and internal mobility pathways.
• Recommit to innovation by protecting creative/product teams from ongoing churn and simplifying decision processes.

Nike’s external brand remains incredibly strong, but the internal signals point to a need for stability, clearer leadership alignment, and a renewed focus on innovation. Addressing these areas will help rebuild trust and set the foundation for long-term growth.


by
| 2382 views | | 11 replies (last December 14) | Reply
Post ID: @OP+1kbxmeyc8

11 replies (most recent on top)

They’ll come back and read this when share price hits $10.

Maybe even an AI supported research project on how to avoid driving a company into the ground.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @187+1kbxmeyc8

“ Nike is dieing and becoming out dated, none of mybsons friends give two shots of over priced low quality shoes that fall apart within 45 months of buying them. Adidas is ki-ling it in the teen department.”

You expect your athletic shoes to last 45 months? Hopefully you are rarely using them and only for light ware…

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @tb+1kbxmeyc8

Nike is dieing and becoming out dated, none of mybsons friends give two shots of over priced low quality shoes that fall apart within 45 months of buying them. Adidas is ki-ling it in the teen department.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @r5+1kbxmeyc8

FYI, the Nike Board of Directors is a sham. Phil Knight as the majority holder of Nike’s voting shares has the final decision. Your letter should be addressed to him.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @nm+1kbxmeyc8

My main issue with Nike is how I am being treated in general, overall like garbage, and expected to be friendly and thankful to have a job still. Management is terrible: micromanages, treats you like a 5-year-old, insults you, dumps a ton of work on you, and expects you to deliver the impossible. Yet they pay you peanuts and put you at a low level, while you provide at a level 3 times higher with no promotion. And then you see others with higher levels who do absolutely nothing, step all over you, and treat you like you are garbage as well. Plus, you have to come in 4 days a week, while others work remotely,

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @d4+1kbxmeyc8

Add to that list the trend of “quiet promoting.” For 2 yrs, I’ve been working at level 40, lead, but being paid level 30, 50 hr work week.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @d1+1kbxmeyc8

@a9 you are right. You would think they would step up. Sadly, though I think the executive team is full of narcissists and leaders who lack true enterprise experience. Like another person said the BOD probably isn’t reading these posts but you know the ELT is and we know HR does as well.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @c9+1kbxmeyc8

The BOD aren’t reading posts on this site.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @ak+1kbxmeyc8

No one cares anymore. At all levels, even the board, it’s a job where you collect a paycheck.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @aa+1kbxmeyc8

that all sounds spot on and great...

likely hood of any of that happening, zero.

why, unknown, no one can explain it....you'd think all these smart C-Suite leaders with their vast years of deep experience would step up and do the right thing?

again, ha and not something I'd bet on...to put in nicely...

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @a9+1kbxmeyc8

jeez, you have delusions of grandeur
you're a shoe/clothing company
that is way overpriced in an economy that is very very stagnant
in a country that has no defining culture anymore
most of nike will be outsourced

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @a8+1kbxmeyc8

Post a reply

: