@ae
It doesn't matter (even if it could). The pattern would be the same. IBM wants to "pioneer" and "be first" to then sc--w up and it never works. Ginni and AK do the same, hype, can't deliver, goes nowhere, desperately find another hype, start the cycle again.
The mediocre management that IBM has had and still has is just inept.
AK is trying to put his head in the sand about his hybrid cloud "strategic move", couldn't deliver, burned the $24b pad in cash for Red Hat... AI? He has no clue where to go with it.... I could go on, but doesn't matter, I made my point, I think.
These people just can't deliver, and on top of that, they are too busy with their short term cost-cutting (make numbers look good for earnings calls) tactics.
AK is also the chairman of the board.... so who controls him or puts pressure on him? Then you have people that don't give a damn, they just care about the stock price. IBM can go nowhere, doesn't matter to them.
My entire point is, where there is something in Quantum or not, doesn't matter. AK just can't make it happen anyway. So the discussion is quite futile.
One interesting thing, other than us and his neighbors, nobody seems to know who the IBM CEO is these days.