Thread regarding Nike Inc. layoffs

How much are Nike VPs being paid to hit diversity targets?

Nike has disclosed that executive compensation includes ESG metrics, which explicitly include diversity outcomes. While the company doesn’t break out the exact weighting, market norms suggest ~10%–20% of annual bonuses are tied to these factors.

Using reasonable assumptions:
• ~385 VPs globally
• VP bonus: ~$100K–$500K
• ESG/diversity weighting: ~10%–20%

Implied diversity-linked bonus per VP:
• ~$10K (low)
• ~$30K–$50K (typical)
• Up to ~$100K

Estimated total annual payout:
• Low: ~$3.9M
• Most likely: ~$12M–$18M
• High: ~$38.5M

Midpoint:
$14M Annually

Why this matters:

At the midpoint, that’s roughly $14M (and could be much more) per year in incentives aligned to these outcomes at the VP level alone.

Bottom line:
A defensible estimate is that Nike directs ~$10M–$20M annually of VP incentive compensation toward diversity-linked metrics; raising legitimate questions about how heavily these targets are weighted relative to other performance priorities.

This post uses only publicly available information, and observational analysis derived from such. Further augmented by published industry trends.


by
| 22 views | | 12 replies (last April 1) | Reply
Post ID: @OP+1kn4htsj2

12 replies (most recent on top)

DEI is a we-ponized joke

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @c0+1kn4htsj2

Diversity is our strength right? Remember those struggle sessions in 2020? Remember the books you were asked to read? The correctness trainings you were given?

ESG has always been a focus, but it has never been maximized like it was in 2020. Virtue signal all you want, but we know the fever that took over Portland, and Nike campus.

How many incompetent people were installed due to that shakeup? We all know the ones. How many are still here just to check a box? You know the ones, you just can’t understand why or how they are in charge?

Reality is more complex than your ideology. Double down on your correctness. Watch it all continue to tumble down…. Anyone with a point of view has been forced out or left.

Product su-ks. Vibe su-ks. Politics rule.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @b1+1kn4htsj2

@aq

Exactly. The performance of a company has nothing to do with the leaders that are running it. Performance can only be improved or lessened by external factors.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @ax+1kn4htsj2

@aq

False. Monetizing it is relatively new. And correlates with observed org compositional changes.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @av+1kn4htsj2

@ak even if this math is right, incentivizing Nike executives to hit DEI targets is not remotely in the conversation about why the company is performing so poorly. Nike has had a similar focus on DEI (and ESG) for decades.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @aq+1kn4htsj2

@ag which part of this is fake?

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @ak+1kn4htsj2

I see you are playing the Trump game - call out a fake boogeyman to distract from core problems

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @ag+1kn4htsj2

@a6 why is discussing DEI triggering?

These are simply aspects of the initiative. Shouldn’t we be celebrating increased awareness?

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @ac+1kn4htsj2

@a6 Funny you think I’m white or a man.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @a7+1kn4htsj2

Fragile white male egos on this site who can only ever discuss DEI. Get therapy and a hobby.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @a6+1kn4htsj2

Sounds about right seeing how these VPs bent over backwards to hire anything with a pulse to hit their targets. Unfortunately, anything with a pulse doesn’t always make for a great appointment.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @a5+1kn4htsj2

Post a reply

: