Thread regarding Wells Fargo & Co. layoffs

Location Strategy Hoax

I was laid off in December without being given the option to move. My former boss, who also lives outside of a hub location, is still working! Are managers exempt from the location strategy?


by
| 2962 views | | 19 replies (last August 22) | Reply
Post ID: @OP+1k345f1f3

19 replies (most recent on top)

Though this seems unfair now -- you will find that this is a blessing in disguise. This location strategy and "business critical" assessment are just excuses. Let go of WF and their excuses.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @kg+1k345f1f3

"It sure is hoax." lmao

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @jt+1k345f1f3

@e1+1k345f1f3

Even better in sharts eyes. He wants to be a modern day NYC slave master. Can't do it with Americans, so he'll use brown people overseas to make it a reality. This clown is the worst kind of CEO.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @gt+1k345f1f3

DEI hires exempt automatically

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @g7+1k345f1f3

@a3 correct. Everyone is overhead.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @g6+1k345f1f3

@a3 Charlotte and Minneapolis have such vibrant downtowns

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @g5+1k345f1f3

There are all of these peoples who seem to know all the details about this obfuscated and confusing location strategy. Like the efficiency plan there will be no end to this. Only the bullies survive. And then they won't.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @ep+1k345f1f3

@df HY will not be a core market. Only for CIB. Soon, everyone else will be kicked out besides OC+1.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @e1+1k345f1f3

No, this phase of location strat ends then, it will continue after that when they consolidate the hubs down to HY and I&P.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @df+1k345f1f3

Location strategy is not done until end of 2026 (commercial) or 2027 (consumer).

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @cj+1k345f1f3

It's not a hoax, but it's not well organized. Near the end of last year my entire org braodened the relocation offers to anyone interested. Sorry you may have missed that. I'm still waiting for my own ticket to get punched.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @b0+1k345f1f3

They deemed you not business critical and flagged your manager as business critical. Simple as that. You might not agree, but that's how they do it.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @az+1k345f1f3

@a5 An English skills assessment would explain a lot about this post.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @aw+1k345f1f3

There's nothing less relevant than location. I guarantee that once there are zero 'staff employees' outside of official hubs that the layoffs will continue. Remotes and non-hubbers are already a minority in some waves. It's not going to stop, the lies about why will just change.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @av+1k345f1f3

Sorry that happened to you. It's up to your group whether they offer relocation or just rehire the position in another city. You are not guaranteed an offer to move. All the roles will eventually go over the next year or two.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @at+1k345f1f3

There is no automatic option to move under the location strategy.
Some people are commuting in. How they got a hall pass I don't know, maybe due to "critical" worker?
"Skills assessment" sounds about right to me. They are saying they don't have the skills to assess you correctly so they are laying you off.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @ab+1k345f1f3

It sure is hoax. Lame and woefully over her head new senior business leader put "skills assessment" in the severance package as the cause. Could not have been farther from the truth and they knew it. Apparently no box to mark stating reason as the BS re-location strategy. To top it off, there are at least a dozen of her employees working in the location I applied for and was rejected. One Wells Fargo.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @a5+1k345f1f3

Maybe they just wanted to lay you off regardless of the location strategy?

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @a3+1k345f1f3

It's not just managers who can be exempt...😉

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @a2+1k345f1f3

Post a reply

: