Thread regarding MetLife Inc. layoffs

"Job Hugging" Is Undermining Workplace Outcomes: New MetLife Study

Look MetLife, here's the deal. I do the job you asked, you pay me.

You DON'T get my soul!

Quoted from MetLife announcement: "56% of employees are staying put out of necessity as financial and job pressures escalate

NEW YORK, N.Y., February 18, 2026 — Amid persistent job market volatility and financial pressures, new MetLife data shows that while employee loyalty is rising, it may be for the wrong reasons. The latest findings from MetLife’s 2026 Employee Benefit Trends Study reveal that while 77% of employees intend to stay1 with their current employer, 56% are staying out of necessity rather than genuine commitment.

This comes as financial confidence among employees has fallen to its lowest level since 2012 and 31% say a primary reason for staying is that the uncertain job market makes it too risky to leave—reinforcing need based retention and putting business performance at risk.

The Cost of Loyalty Without Commitment

The consequences of this dynamic are significant, with only 18% of employees saying they plan to stay with their employer because they truly want to. Employees who stay out of necessity experience much weaker outcomes: only 50% are actively engaged in their work and they are 54% less likely to be holistically healthy, resulting in higher risks of absenteeism and lower productivity.

“As employees cling to their jobs for security, retention alone can give employers a false sense of stability—even as wellbeing, engagement, and productivity quietly erode,” said Todd Katz, Head of U.S. Group Benefits at MetLife. “This puts renewed pressure on employers to strengthen their cultures, leadership and benefits in ways that foster real connection and true commitment.”

Connection: The Strongest Driver of Outcomes

MetLife’s study reveals connection—including feeling seen, valued, and supported at work—is now the strongest predictor of employee wellbeing, engagement, and commitment. When employees feel connected at work, they are:

3x more likely to be holistically healthy
2x more likely to be engaged
3x more likely to stay because they want to, not because they need to

Together, these findings show that connection is what separates surface-level stability from a workforce that is resilient, productive and built to perform under pressure. Without it, outcomes stall, and loyalty weakens.

Creating the Conditions for True Connection

Connection grows when employees feel a sense of belonging at work, are supported in their professional growth and are recognized for their contributions—experiences often shaped by leaders, workplace culture, and benefits that reinforce support beyond compensation alone, according to the study’s qualitative findings.

“Forging genuine commitment begins when employees feel seen, supported, and valued, not just retained,” Katz added. “Benefits that adapt to employees’ needs—and are clearly communicated—reinforce trust, strengthen connection, and help organizations move beyond transactional loyalty toward more meaningful, sustainable outcomes.”

About MetLife’s Employee Benefit Trends Study & Methodology

MetLife’s U.S. Employee Benefit Trends Study (EBTS) is a leading source of insights into workplace trends, employee expectations, and employer strategies. MetLife’s 2026 EBTS is based on two quantitative studies, conducted in October 2025, including surveys of 2,480 HR decision-makers and leaders, and 2,541 full-time employees from organizations of various industries and sizes. Respondents are aged 21+ and nationally representative of the full-time U.S. workforce in terms of demographics, job roles, and firmographics. New to the 24th EBTS, MetLife used cultural insights and semiotics to explore shifting habits, motivations, and feelings among workers. The research is collected in partnership with STRAT7, a global strategy, insight, and planning consultancy."


by
| 845 views | | 17 replies (last March 25) | Reply
Post ID: @OP+1kjgecp1w

17 replies (most recent on top)

@3tj how do you know what I know or don't know? What color are my knickers today?

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @3wr+1kjgecp1w

@2ds she is on fmla. Don’t be an a$$ you know nothing of the situation.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @3tj+1kjgecp1w

The Job market is bad. Took me almost 5 months to find another job but pay is almost 10% higher than Met and they treat people amazing! Start looking aggressively and you can escape this horrible place.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @3sc+1kjgecp1w

People can layer their PTO on top of their bereavement leave🤷

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @2ta+1kjgecp1w

What's the bereavement leave policy these days? Is it unlimited days off for an HRBP, but only 3 measly days off for the Minions at Met? Time to grieve the loss of a cherished loved one shouldn't be determined according to one's corporate title. You already played that sick game with our recent AVIP allocations. Gain a moral compass before it's too late.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @2ds+1kjgecp1w

@20p you know, stop acting d-mb.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @22x+1kjgecp1w

@qt Indiana?

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @20p+1kjgecp1w

Somewhat related: https://www.fastcompany.com/91502603/millennials-dont-want-to-quit-they-want-to-get-laid-off

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @1pg+1kjgecp1w

@14c same could be said for RIS. Questioning the need for the many AVPs is apparently a big no-no. Let the 💩 show live on!

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @14j+1kjgecp1w

@a2 actually firing someone for poor performance isn’t as easy as you think. I’m looking at YOU GTO. Headcount (a.k.a. budget dollars) is king. Lose the numbers and you lose $$.
Sure makes you wonder about all the @$$ kissing that goes on not to mention who is REALLY in control.
It keeps the ones who don’t even get out of bed until 10 from losing their jobs.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @14c+1kjgecp1w

I've been around met for awhile and played my fair share of the manager swap game. First company I've worked for where I've had a new manager basically every year because senior leadership can't get their sh-t together. And it's astonishing to me how much your manager can make or break your experience at this company. It's plainly obvious managers aren't trained here or, if they are, the training is sh-t.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @10h+1kjgecp1w

@cc it’s not just 200 Park. Cary has a few in GTO who need to be run out the door.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @t7+1kjgecp1w

0% enjoy working with people from Indiana.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @qt+1kjgecp1w

@cc Exactly. Why the emphasis on "engagement"? Because the managers either don't know, or don't care to figure out who is actually doing the work.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @dj+1kjgecp1w

Please ... A 💩 face dum as fuq AVP "people leader" at 200 Park should have been fired YEARS AGO! Met tolerates and coddles its bottom of the barrel "talent".

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @cc+1kjgecp1w

"and 31% say a primary reason for staying is that the uncertain job market makes it too risky to leave—reinforcing need based retention and putting business performance at risk."

How does it put business performance at risk?

If an employee isn't doing the job, management can fire the employee and hire someone else.

This is nonsense. A way for management to avoid their responsibility.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @a2+1kjgecp1w

This announcement rankles me.

"Genuine commitment"? Does that go both ways?

"Actively engaged in their work" -- what does that mean? Are they doing the job you asked them to do? Or do you want them to do multiple jobs for the same pay?

Let me summarize the big finding. MetLife found that most people work for the money and if they could, they'd be somewhere else. Simply astounding. Someone ought to submit that to the Harvard Business Review.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @a1+1kjgecp1w

Post a reply

: