Another 50 roles cut…
10 replies (most recent on top)
@pe Shell’s not a player in refining anymore. What do cuts in chemicals have to do with your whining?
50 fewer roles? Thought job hiring/retention numbers were increasing according to the current administration. Drill Baby Drill, Refine Baby Refine!?
No need to drill and refine here when you can easily take over another country’s reserves.
They need to cut in operations too. There is so much unnecessary fat there.
@a2 Shell chemicals not PEMEX, staff roles. Mostly projects folks.
Chemicals? Staff positions?
@ah Napoleon tried something similar. Remember how that ended? How about Genghis Khan? Or that guy with the little mustache? Careful with that axe, Eugene.
@ab
You're not thinking right. Instead, think we "Win Bigly!" Then we can take all three. And I know that you are talking about Greenland and Mexico which are only two entities... But "winning bigly" means we can take even more!
@a7 Mexico will not be seized. Too big. Nor Greenland. That’s a diversion meant to bring Greenland to a sale discussion.
If it’s the Pemex facility, when the current US Administration seizes control of Mexico (after Greenland and Colombia) those 50 roles will be restored but will be more beautiful - many people are saying.
Chemicals side or over on the Pemex side?