Thread regarding MetLife Inc. layoffs

LTL - Stock buybacks - What a sh---y answer

I hope you saw the LTL today and Michel's tap dancing about stock buybacks.

Not once in his defensive and pandering speech did he mention how Met's buybacks benefited its employees. I wonder why?

I also loved the line of "when our investors buy our stock and give us money, we have to return that money to them." This is a lie, plain and simple. The last time Met sold stock on the market was 2008. We haven't gotten money from direct sales of shares on the market since then.

For the executive team reading this, next time you have him do a song and dance to convince us why spending $3+ billion on stock buybacks is a good thing, make sure he mentions Met's employees more than zero times.

Don't worry though, the $15 million he's paid yearly is a good investment for our investors when we're pouring billions back out onto the open market.

by
| 3323 views | | 13 replies (last March 1, 2023) | Reply
Post ID: @OP+1ldxd63e

13 replies (most recent on top)

More like our bonus will be paid in free candy and reduced price lunches. That'll boost morale!

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @dhke+1ldxd63e

Post ID: @cvma+1ldxd63e

Hah, like they'd give even RSUs to the peons.

Considering Met doesn't offer an employee stock purchase plan, I doubt they think we even know what stock is.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @dpnd+1ldxd63e

Post ID: @OP+1ldxd63e
Don't be surprised when the bonuses are paid with RSU's.

If there are layoffs-- you lose the RSU's
If you quite - you lose the RSU's
If the stock tanks - you lose.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @cvma+1ldxd63e

Up votes for new USB, C Suite and SLT people.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @8nfn+1ldxd63e

So what you’re saying is. It’s a nifty and cozy financial relationship between institutional shareholders and their hand picked (bought and paid for $15M) arranged marriage with Captain Obvious Khalaf?

At the direction of the largest institutional investors C$pt$in Obvious Kh$l$f was given the master plan to fundamentally change the company from an outdated wasteful dinosaur into a shiny brand new cutting edge (hold the laughter) lean mean fighting machine?

The roosters always come home to roost. The IID’s are plenty. Good luck.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @8aks+1ldxd63e

Up votes for company sale, in part?

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @2xyg+1ldxd63e

Up votes for company getting positioned for a sale? In whole?

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @2ucl+1ldxd63e

Not sure MK was brought in to "fix" things.

If radical change was the intention, I'd think the board would have gone with an outsider.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @1roi+1ldxd63e

CEO was brought in to execute shareholders plans. The company was a bloated mess. Outdated technology. Think of who the largest shareholders are. They are the ones calling the shots. CEO is just their puppet. A handsomely paid puppet. 2 years now…less bloated. Technology? Skeletons still in closets?

Now the final phase. Total consolidation of jobs and layoffs.

The “pause” is bull. Notice how it’s the reverse? Pause in hiring is double talk. Pausing to see who is going to leave within the next several months. At which time we will assess the “ecosystem “ and determine what positions need to be filled.

It’s business. They don’t care about you. They want you to believe they care but…they don’t.

If feeling valued is important then find another job.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @1vli+1ldxd63e

His answer missed one really big, important point -- the price of the stock.

Stock buy backs make sense in theory when the value of the stock is less than intrinsic value.

But, when the stock is overvalued (and management hates to ever say that it is, but the market will), doing a buy back actually destroys value.

In the overvalued case, it's better to just send the shareholders a check. If they want to buy stock with that check, fine, let them. If they want to sell the overvalued stock, the market already supports that.

He also neglected to talk about the tax implications of buy backs. For a finance company CEO, it was a lightweight answer.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @1dha+1ldxd63e

Yup get out. Get out now!

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @1cxz+1ldxd63e

The gaslighting and manipulation continue. Employees are pawns in their larger plan. Work work work, my path my path my path, cross train cross train.

Get out!!!

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @1dia+1ldxd63e

I don't have anything to add other than a big F U to Michel.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @usj+1ldxd63e

Post a reply

: