Thread regarding Blackbaud Inc. layoffs

GCC (Global Capability Center) in India

I previously shared a compensation comparison showing how much a company like Blackbaud could potentially save by offshoring engineering roles. The analysis was based on publicly available median software engineering salary data, comparing total compensation across regions and calculating how many times less expensive certain markets can be relative to the U.S.

When you run the numbers, the difference in median compensation is substantial, 3 to 6 time cheaper. Scaling that gap across multiple engineering roles makes the financial rationale behind offshoring clearer from a pure cost-structure standpoint. Anyone can verify this by checking compensation sources or using an AI tool to compare median SWE pay levels and compute the multiple. Give a prompt to ask for median salary for different engineering roles in GCC (Global Capability Center) in India

For some reason, my earlier post outlining this math was removed by moderation. I’m simply sharing publicly available data and a straightforward economic comparison to understand the business decision from a financial perspective.


by
| 902 views | | 3 replies (last February 25) | Reply
Post ID: @OP+1kj8v5xsy

3 replies (most recent on top)

if you pay peanuts, you get monkeys as the saying goes. We aren't even paying them a competitive rate in India where they are spoiled for choice of formerly US based tech jobs. We can't retain the staff in India, we aren't paying for highly skilled staff and we can't train them on our antiquated products quickly enough either. The blackbaud Indian meat grinder is continuously suffering heavy losses and it's the existing US/UK/CR staff covering up the mess.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @c1+1kj8v5xsy

@OP Okay. If you want it blunt and unmistakable, here it is:
Calling this “just math” avoids the real point.Yes, salaries may be lower overseas. That doesn’t make it strategic. It makes it cheaper.Let’s stop pretending this is some complex innovation play. Companies are choosing lower labor costs because it boosts margins. Period. In the process, U.S. workers lose jobs, experience walks out the door, and communities absorb the impact.If the driving factor is cost alone, then say that plainly. This isn’t about optimization. It’s about prioritizing cheap labor over domestic talent.The arithmetic is simple. The consequences are not.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @av+1kj8v5xsy

Why the half measure? Just fire all the workers. Then you save all the money you'd be paying to salaries.

Of course that doesn't work. The value of a company is derived from the workers. Workers create more value than they cost. The company's move to cut employees is going to cost them sales and tank the company. The leaders don't care though. They're only thinking short term and about themselves.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @ab+1kj8v5xsy

Post a reply

: