It won’t surprise anybody that posts with either hate speech or named individuals have short lives. But there are also posts without those qualities that are also disappearing. Some of those posts carry painful truth.
I wonder if somebody on the payroll tasked with trying to clamp down every possible thing that might not reflect well on the enterprise. Or does it just take, say, 5 individual “users” to report something (validity be d@mned) and then the thread is ki-led.
Anyway, as much as you may think this site gives you a good lens on the pulse of things it does not. It is selective and sugar-coated. (And of course no single site alone would have objectivity or completeness.)