Thread regarding Thomson Reuters layoffs

4 replies (most recent on top)

@xn I've heard "20%"

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @y0+1k9a4q0d7

@x3+1k9a4q0d7

I merely asked if the practice is company-wide and if there is a target %. Conceptually I might agree, however, how you define "underperformers" is subjective.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @xn+1k9a4q0d7

What's wrong with culling underperformers? This shouldn't be a charity

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @x3+1k9a4q0d7

@OP the stacked rankings have been in place for years. I don’t remember the exact numbers but I think it’s somewhere between 2-5% of each department have to have rankings lower and/or higher than achieved (both ends). The use of PIPs to mange people out has been around for a while too but has definitely increased in the past few years.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @mw+1k9a4q0d7

Post a reply

: