Thread regarding Northwestern Mutual layoffs

46 replies (most recent on top)

How many got impacted with the recent layoffs?

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @4xj+1knt4ahym

@4mh Easy, just send the Infosys and LTIM people home

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @4tr+1knt4ahym

@4rn - Numbers. It is based on numbers.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @4tq+1knt4ahym

@4mh what is that based on? Did you actually hear that?

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @4rn+1knt4ahym

BR has a goal to get rid of 1350 people in tech.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @4mh+1knt4ahym

@3jf AI is driving many of the IT layoffs. Gemini & Claude are taking over.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @3v6+1knt4ahym

@38b+1knt4ahym The company has a policy of not informing people widely of layoffs to avoid people freaking out, at most the department level finds out through some mass email or Slack message. Managers sometimes find out about divisional reductions during skip level meetings.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @3jf+1knt4ahym

@2y how did you get this information? I haven’t heard of anyone getting laid off over the past couple of months. Was it a specific tech area or across the board?

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @38b+1knt4ahym

@23d you’re wrong. Or you have no idea who the department heads are.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @370+1knt4ahym

Total released = 75
Over age 40 = 52 (69%)
Tech roles = 65 (77%)

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @2yn+1knt4ahym

No real losses this round. Maybe Selfie Susie, Misfit Mia, and other NS/SR leftovers will say farewell next round.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @23p+1knt4ahym

Suddenly I see why people don't communicate everything all the time. Vagueposting is worse than not posting at all.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @23g+1knt4ahym

@1hw No, they did not. White males made those decisions.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @23d+1knt4ahym

@1hw white males have it so tough

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @1xv+1knt4ahym

@19a except that some people who were let go were white males and the high level leadership who made that choice are all women who are Indian

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @1hw+1knt4ahym

Most SLT takes immense pleasure in running the company like a “small business” but they spread the word of DEI like fanatic ayothollahs! DEI is like religious cult to impose and see who is pure and use it for their own advantage. If McKinsey is asking to cut they will, and they will hire indentured H1B for diversity

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @1cw+1knt4ahym

@1ca multiple middle managers and some lower level developers were let go Tuesday, and a bunch more Wednesday. Just because it’s not on your team doesn’t mean it’s fake

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @1ch+1knt4ahym

No one was laid off on our team and we hardly have work for 8 hours a week forget 40 hours. People here are spreading rumors.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @1ca+1knt4ahym

@19t
Ya the people mentioning DEI are ridiculous. Not that it matters, but I know white men who were laid off. This is definitely not them reversing course on DEI or whatever the idea is. This is them cutting costs and making the existing workforce do more work, but in their eyes it's fine because of AI.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @1ar+1knt4ahym

@19t I have some good news for you. You know this huge push to change the way we work at NM? It turns out reading a book only goes so far. So, McKinsey is back, baby! They’re going to make it so great that you’ll get tired of all the winning!

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @1a0+1knt4ahym

@19d I heard the new White House DEI guidelines say we should hire more orange, fat, senile, failed businessmen who like to hang out with New York financiers and prowl for underage girls.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @19z+1knt4ahym

Every layoff round, same script — blame diversity programs instead of the people making the actual decisions. Nobody's getting cut because of DEI. They're getting cut because leadership burned through a quarter billion on LearnVest, shuttered it, and has been running the McKinsey playbook ever since — hire fast, reorg quarterly, cut the people who did the actual work, repeat. A $40B company that can't retain the engineers and senior ICs keeping the lights on isn't suffering from too much inclusion. It's suffering from the same avarice, ignorance, and greed that's been driving strategy from the top for years. But sure, it was the diversity hire's fault.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @19t+1knt4ahym

So if we are trimming some of our “talent” pool that means NM will hire less H1b1s right?…. Right?

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @19r+1knt4ahym

Facts from the white house. Sounds legit.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @19d+1knt4ahym

Maybe NM read the new report from the White House proving that DEI adds no value and in fact costs companies money. It’s about time they cleaned up.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @19a+1knt4ahym

Are they targeting NYC and remote employees? Not going to renew the lease?

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @194+1knt4ahym

Do we know how many or which specific areas in tech?

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @18v+1knt4ahym

Yup, I'm a DT SWE laid off today. What a fun month lol

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @146+1knt4ahym

@144 I mean...they only made 40 billion in revenue last year. How can they afford to keep all of these people working?

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @145+1knt4ahym

Looks like another reorg . Quarterly reorg lol . And from the words more is coming maybe for non managers/higher up?

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @144+1knt4ahym

@12w as someone who was just laid off. You're wrong.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @13q+1knt4ahym

Just notified my position was eliminated. They'll be giving more info to everyone on 4/17

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @13p+1knt4ahym

Deeply flawed strategy in NM is to deliberately target remote employees and the most dedicated hard workers. These individuals are assigned disproportionately heavy, complex workloads designed to overwhelm them. The intent is clear: if they succeed, pile on even more until burnout forces them to leave voluntarily. If they fail, it creates a convenient paper trail to justify layoffs.
In this environment, true safety and advancement belong only to DEI fanatics and the back-scratchers who su-k up the corporate ladder. Those who exploit the blood, sweat, and results of others—then claim full credit—are the ones who thrive. It has become the unspoken “rule of nature” in NM. It erodes trust, drives out top talent, and rewards politics over performance.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @13j+1knt4ahym

For those saying no layoffs, from a former M2 here I can tell you they try to keep it as quiet as they can. When I had direct reports being let go during the great QA purge, not all of management was even invited to the briefing. They waited until the next town hall so they could try to fudge the messaging the best they could.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @13e+1knt4ahym

Rumors…no layoffs. Get back to work.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @12w+1knt4ahym

I was laid off in a past wave (years ago) with a near-maximum severance package. The severance really was a great thing to receive, as I quickly landed a new role with better pay, but I am now looking to make a change.

My initial first hand survey of the market & feedback from trusted contacts suggests the grass is not greener: FTE salary bands are compressing and contract rates (W2/1099) have plummeted.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @119+1knt4ahym

You were correct. There were layoffs in tech today

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @10g+1knt4ahym

These are the posts that I come here for! Thank you.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @10c+1knt4ahym

I was let go a year and a half. The package was incredible and the best thing that happened to me. ~ Former Sr Director in Data!

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @we+1knt4ahym

I’m remote. There are a whopping 3 positions at my level even open right now. NM HATES remote employees. I’d take a severance package in a heartbeat.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @vt+1knt4ahym

Post a reply

: