Thread regarding Centene Corp. layoffs

Margins over membership

Said specifically by CEO yesterday during UBS call. Also indicated Centene is not trying to grow at this point (hence the title) and that they are bracing for up to 30+ percent drop in ACA membership. Medicaid will really feel it come 2017. And that’s not even considering what impact continued gains in AI will mean for employees. I hate to be negative here, but I’m not seeing much upside.


by
| 2916 views | | 14 replies (last November 23) | Reply
Post ID: @OP+1ka1f9cwf

14 replies (most recent on top)

@1hn If you don’t like capitalism, vote it out. But that’s the rules of the game here in America as of today. Get rich or die trying.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @1jq+1ka1f9cwf

@1aw lol really? No sh-t, Sherlock, but they make plenty of money - record profits actually, so they can most def pay employees, they just don't want to take a pay cut themselves. It's cool if you want to stand behind unethical business practices that may indeed cost you your position in the company one day.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @1hn+1ka1f9cwf

@1aw I know reading can be hard. The key word is “greedy”. Of course you have to make money. Question is, when is enough, enough.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @1cv+1ka1f9cwf

@vy do you understand that if the company doesn’t make money, they can’t pay their employees?

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @1aw+1ka1f9cwf

@vy While you are correct about greed, if a company has a stock ticker, they are gonna be greedy. Capitalism and all.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @wh+1ka1f9cwf

@s2 Ok so it didn't make sense because they won't make money, and that's the whole point, isn't it? They care more about money than the members or employees. Period. THE END. That being said, they are not only losing members, but they will also cut staff. I don't care if it makes sense from a "business standpoint". This company is GREEDY and it comes at a cost to the people making them that $$.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @vy+1ka1f9cwf

@dq they are exiting business that isn’t profitable. They literally just did it with one of the Florida contracts. The state wouldn’t give us a rate that made financial sense, so we walked away from it.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @s2+1ka1f9cwf

@gg I disagree. While it’s definitely not surprising as a publicly traded company, it is very concerning. Especially for the employees that are inevitably going to be fired. After all, this is a site focused on layoffs, not Wall Street Bets.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @k1+1ka1f9cwf

No margin, no mission. It has always been margin first. Always.

This is neither shocking nor concerning.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @gg+1ka1f9cwf

@b4 Explain how that works? We know they aren't going to take a personal pay cut, and they certainly aren't going to retain employees by losing that cash flow. So they will RIF and raise premiums. Further proving that it's not about the employees and it damn sure isn't about the members.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @dq+1ka1f9cwf

Marketplace is definitely going to take a hit. They won’t want to give up Caid easily - and if they do it’ll be those without any sort of Care DSNP attached.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @bs+1ka1f9cwf

@b4 Probably not good for headcount. Less members + more AI = fewer employees. Possibly by a lot.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @bc+1ka1f9cwf

2017???????

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @b8+1ka1f9cwf

The upside is that we are no longer operating under a “grow at all costs” mentality that has led to us bleeding resources on unprofitable business. Margins over membership means we are going to focus on profitability rather than trying to just get as many members as possible. That’s a good thing.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @b4+1ka1f9cwf

Post a reply

: