Thread regarding U.S. Bank layoffs

Ready for laid off

It will be interesting to see how many U.S. Bank employees face layoffs this year, especially as the company continues to absorb the high costs of Amazon and EA hires over the past year—significantly straining the cloud program budget. Despite these costly hires, leadership has taken no meaningful action, reflecting a concerning lack of accountability.

Many of these ex-Amazon and EA hires hold high-grade positions, exerting excessive pressure on their teams while simultaneously taking credit for the hard work of others. Rather than driving real execution, they are presenting a false narrative of success, which is far from reality.

The state of the Shield Platform, including its cloud operations, has been deeply disappointing, resulting in the loss of many trusted and long-standing employees. If this trend continues, a significant workforce reduction seems inevitable.

A reckoning is on the horizon—are we prepared for the consequences?

Gunjan Kedia, as the incoming CEO, this is a critical wake-up call. Decisive action is urgently needed. The ongoing indecision from leaders like Pete and Zeph is only making matters worse. Strong leadership is essential to navigate this crisis and prevent further damage.

by
| 3482 views | | 12 replies (last February 13, 2025) | Reply
Post ID: @OP+1jke6r2wb

12 replies (most recent on top)

Thank you Post ID: @179+1jke6r2wb . It needed to be said!

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @17a+1jke6r2wb

Perfect example of a self-important tech bro right below this comment. Completely clueless about anything related to business, sales, pricing, balance sheet management, bank funding, customer demographics and targeted marketing, risk management, or anything really except coding and working on the software that yes is an important support function to the overall process of running a profitable financial institution in a highly regulated environment. Know YOUR place tech bro. Do your work and stay in your lane.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @179+1jke6r2wb

“So many posters on this site seem to think that most of the bank's employees work in Tech. Yo, tech bros, it's not all about you. Most of the bank is not self-important tech bros. You are a support function. Yes, I'm looking at you OP. The revenue businesses are the only reason you exist. So sit down and do your work or leave.”

The stupidity and lack of intelligence in this comment and especially that last line is simply appalling. In 2025 EVERY business is run on tech and yes, “tech bros” are the ones making the big bucks because they ARE the reason for your existence in todays business world (not the other way around). If you don’t believe me go open a bank without the latest tech and see how many customers sign up. Know your place @h0+1jke6r2wb

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @16z+1jke6r2wb

Most recent comment is TL;DR.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @167+1jke6r2wb

So-called "tech bros" and others posting useful insights here typically speak on their experience at U.S. Bank, so, if one was working in a tech or support organization, I'm not sure why they would go into depth posting issues with a sales organization or other revenue-generating BLs.

"The revenue businesses are the only reason you exist." I suppose one could attempt to run a business solely on revenue-generating business. I'm not sure what your product or service would be based on with no tech and no customer support. That business would have eliminated large expenses and should be very profitable. That is if any customers could be sold on dealing with such a no-tech and no-support business.

Unfortunately, the "tech bro" created easy-to-use LLMs that many use today are unable to assist in this task:
"In summary, while it’s an attractive idea to imagine a startup that is 'purely revenue generating' without any associated costs in technology or customer support, the reality is that every successful business needs some level of investment in infrastructure and customer care—even if that investment is minimized or automated. The functions of technology and customer support are integral to delivering a quality product or service and ensuring customer satisfaction."

The posted comment, "The revenue businesses are the only reason you (tech bros) exist." could just as easily be, "The only reason that a revenue business line can exist is due to the ongoing investments in tech, customer support, and other so-called non-revenue business lines."

The focus on us and them seems pervasive between senior executives and front-line employees, between departments, and elsewhere. Not sure how that serves anyone.

Signed, not-a-tech-bro

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @15a+1jke6r2wb

So many posters on this site seem to think that most of the bank's employees work in Tech. Yo, tech bros, it's not all about you. Most of the bank is not self-important tech bros. You are a support function. Yes, I'm looking at you OP. The revenue businesses are the only reason you exist. So sit down and do your work or leave.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @h0+1jke6r2wb

Good assessment (Ready For Layoff). What gets me the most is the year-over-year marketing as a “most ethical company”. They’re far from it.

Layoff campaigns have been running for years now, low & slow to keep them out of the media headlines. The latest wave was early Jan-2025. Grapevine says about 105 employees. An outsider would view this as nothing, which is exactly what management wants. The thing is, it’s part of a much larger plan. The cuts are rotated through business lines.

Another point is the high employee salary expense. They’re cutting higher salaried veteran employees to replace them with much lower salaried less experienced employees. Someone has to pay for all of the expensive West coast (Amazon and other) tech talent. It’s like nepotism where ex-tech talent then brings in their friends at high total cost while running low-performance programs. Seriously.

The cloud migration initiative has performed poorly. They’re at least a year behind schedule due to incompetence and constant resets. That’s costing them additional tens of millions of dollars if not more. Someone has to pay, and we’ve seen some senior leaders suddenly depart.

If an “ethical” company is undertaking recurring actions affecting the employee base and programs at least be transparent about it… but no. They are not. The joke is that there is so much work to do and their attempt is to become more aggressive about doing it (squeeze the people), while they’re releasing the talent that can help them do it. Some three-ringed circus.

Ask me anything. I know where the bodies are buried.

  • Most Ethical Deception
by
| | Reply
Post ID: @cz+1jke6r2wb

Shield Platform, EA, AI, and Employee Tech are the corporate equivalents of decorative office plants, nice to have but serving no real purpose. Shield Platform protects… something, EA drafts grand frameworks no one follows, AI burns cash while learning nothing useful, and Employee Tech ensures productivity stays just low enough to avoid suspicion. Honestly, cutting 80% of this wouldn’t just save costs, it’d be an upgrade.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @br+1jke6r2wb

Sorry for my ignorance. Can someone explain more about these ex amazon workers?

I’m in a different department and not aware!

Thanks

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @ax+1jke6r2wb

Hi same person who has been posting the same sentiment for weeks.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @aj+1jke6r2wb

TL;DR

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @a5+1jke6r2wb

Brought to you by chatgpt

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @a3+1jke6r2wb

Post a reply

: