Thread regarding Ford layoffs

Ford should eliminate their bases in Europe, South America, Middle East instead of layoffs in USA

Analyzing 2018 Financial's Ford N/A carried the company in all segments; profits, EBIT, etc. And Ford sold cars too. Upper mgmt. is not being transparent in pushing for layoffs in the USA while keeping still a large presence in Europe, South America, Middle East, China, all those divisions lost a lot of money that could have been used to sponsor the new electrification trends.

We in the US are paying the consequences for upper management bad decisions in those markets. Ford Board of Directors should have been more proactive performing a performance assessment of all VP's and their directors and get rid of the low performers at that level. For those who are authentic personnel working for Ford would agree that Quality is defined at the lower level by the GSRs . But key financial decisions are made at LL3/2 and above and only one VP are removed, Bakai.

Indeed there are many LL's who have been in the company for many years and keep changing chairs, if upper mgmt were really committed to purge the leadership levels, many LL's should have gone but only a handful were let go.

Although a painful process, we engineers knew that this event was going to happen just by looking to GM. Purging the ranks were done in 06/07/08 during the down turn just after Mullaly took over but his administration focused on GSR's. Now there were some LL's impacted but not as many as they should.

I wonder for how long is Wall Street will continue giving an easy pass to upper mgmt in regards their decision to continue financing low performers divisions outside the US

by
| 1022 views | | 2 replies (last May 28, 2019) | Reply
Post ID: @OP+ZhXcMPA

2 replies (most recent on top)

Ford cars are uncompetitive in China and Ford is struggling in Europe because they do not listen to local customers needs. Instead the Dearborn management decides for the Chinese customers because FNA management think they know best. People need a reason why they should buy a certain car. (Buzzwords like "Team Edison" or "Design thinking" or "Greenfield Labs" are no such reasons) At least in one or two areas the car must be better than its competition. On a clobal scale Ford Derborn management delivers only mediocre products and when the customer response is disappointing they put the blame on the local organisations on other continents. Erasing headcount cannot replace the fact that competitive products are the key to success. Cars are not office chairs.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @sep+ZhXcMPA

Ford's cars aren't competitive in foreign markets because of high cost of US labor keeps its cars uncompetitively priced. Even if you consider just US workers, Ford's cost of labor is 50% higher than Mercedes Benz, Volkswagen, and Hyundai, never mind foreign divisions. If Ford wants to compete in the long run, it needs more foreign labor, not less, because US labor vs. talent is some of the most uncompetitively priced in the world. For example, even Mexico graduates more electrical engineers per year than the US in recent years, of of US graduates, you go to any top tier graduate program in the last two decades, it's mostly Indian and East Asian faces. Top US talent assuredly isn't going into the automotive field in 2019.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @skp+ZhXcMPA

Post a reply

: