Thread regarding Riverbed Technology Inc. layoffs

SlopNet taking over ?

I don’t know how SlopNet people somehow manage to screw up Riverbed. We knew it was a bad acquisition that caused the division among the riverbed originals. We know the old Opnet leaders were total sleeve balls that ran the company through fear, loathing and politics. Post acquisition, many Opnet people drained their sales funnel and left. We know SH business funded the SteelCentral BU for years which allowed for certain teams to restart their products.

On top of all this, MS somehow continue to convince that a TAM and magic quadrants equals success, which anyone will tell you is not. TAM and MQ means squat, it’s all about actual numbers like sales. If sales can’t sell your products MS, it’s not 100% sales people fault but most likely a product problem and those related to product.

The riverbed leaders are just dumb, truly not seeing past the “fake news” that is Opnet. Left on its own, Opnet would’ve died off or simply existed a tiny east cost company that people wouldn’t forgotten about.

To, my hat goes off to Opnet for fooling so many folks into finding your broken products while convincing riverbed leadership that their own product is dying and a commodity - the classic tea pot and kettle situation! The only thing I wish for these Opnet people to do is focus their politicking and lies towards our competitors rather than our Trumpish leaders because they’re not smart.

by
| 2431 views | | 6 replies (last April 13, 2019) | Reply
Post ID: @OP+YrUjqZm

6 replies (most recent on top)

I think There are some SlopNet folks still around, just the sloppiest of SlopNet .. you know, the c---roaches that can survive a nuclear explosion.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @7sbx+YrUjqZm

Too many legacy leaders who either missed the boat during the internet boom or greedy leaders looking to buy a longer boat before they retire.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @7lor+YrUjqZm

Wtf are you smoking, I might want some. Slop was bought almost 7 years ago, most all of their senior mgrs got pushed out or left shortly after.

Rvbd has been run by rejects from Cisco, CA, etc... have needed new leadership for years. Now they also need to get away from tb where they could invest more into their products, give customers more value, you know do things successful tech companies do to grow their business. SH is dead, get over it.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @6kfd+YrUjqZm

Effects of the previous layoffs will be seen soon in Q2 with reduced productivity. Lot of good leaders are not with us now.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @1bym+YrUjqZm

Too long to read but I’ll comment around MQ’s , TAM’s and folks like forester and Gartner. In the end, these companies do not posses clairvoyant powers and are often wrong. TAM values are almost always grossly over calculated. The intent is to only spark market excitement. MQ’s are flawed because vendors will alway put their best foot forward, which isn’t consistent to how a company sells/positions/markets their product. The bottom line is, regardless of TAM or position on the MQ, your company’s execution is what will dictate if forester and Gartner are right in the end. If anything, it’s just information that these companies are selling, which doesn’t paint the entire picture.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @hxa+YrUjqZm

Ouch! Some parts are true, other parts I’m not sure about. Whether it’s all true or not, we had to try something to get to JK’s goal of being a $1B company.

AE mentioned about growth but growth is a very funny metric. Growth from $1 to $2 over a year is 100%. So the important data to know is the growth rate (YoY) of SteelCentral for the past 10 years, including pre-acquisition and should include the (raw data points) revenue numbers used in the growth calculation. The reasons being is that we need to put to rest this whole Opnet vs. Riverbed thing and move forward.

To leaders, can you share this?

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @vqt+YrUjqZm

Post a reply

: