Thread regarding Mattel Inc. layoffs

Don’t you find it ironic......?

Don’t you find it ironic and a bit sickening that we’re celebrating 60 years of Barbie - the most sinister and degrading symbol of s-xualization of women by women? It’s true - the majority of leadership, marketing, design and engineering over the years have all been women - and they all had a strong hand in how Barbie abandoned girls and women.

All this talk about Barbie’s many professions is just convenience - those all were just fashions - not truly professions (and all of them were trivialized). I also find it disheartening that the “launch” happened on the international day of the woman - when in fact Mattel has been donating all kinds of money to the UN to legitmize Barbie.

All of this (plus all the money Mattel throws at this decking toy) can’t sustain it.

Hey, Mattel - do you REALLY want to do something for women? Cancel Barbie on your own terms - rather than continue to let it happen on its own. Stand up and be fearless for once. You don’t have anyone fooled except for the lazy analysts.

by
| 1991 views | | 8 replies (last April 11, 2019) | Reply
Post ID: @OP+Yg2UOI9

8 replies (most recent on top)

Bring back bigger boobed Barbie and strip away all her careers. She's a classic icon and should be celebrated for all her blond s-xiness. That's what little girls want.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @gwrj+Yg2UOI9

Barbie is just a tool to generate cash, but like other brands and companies that sought to crush competition (ie: TRU vs. all the stand alone toy retailers), she woke up one day to find that she had won...…...and lost everything. Without competition, brands stagnate and have no place in society. Barbie's "I can be anything" isn't original, nor has she really ever represented it. All the sophomoric dreck RD and LM have put out over the last 5 years have:

1) Failed from a PR and revenue generating standpoint

2) Been uninteresting to the target 3-6 year old girls

3) Been laughed at by 7-30 year old females

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @ctmf+Yg2UOI9

Leftist social justice warrior types will always see Barbie as problematic simply because they view the world through a lens in which every element of our society is symptomatic of a larger, pervasive unjust system.

The risk Mattel faces in their appempts to appeal to these apoplectically woke moms is that they risk pushing the diversity and inclusiveness too far. By taking away her controversial unrealistic elements, Barbie risks disappearing altogether.

She's either the iconic, unattainable figure, blonde and waif-like, with huge eyes, or she is – what, exactly? Make her real, and she ceases to exist. She becomes a brand, a category heading, like American Girl, Monster High, Bratz. You already see this happening to a certain degree. Margo Robbie will hopefully help reinforce the classic Barbie character if and when that movie is released.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @2gfb+Yg2UOI9

Barbie is ok. She still has a place. But is she all that she once was even 10 years ago? No way. I agree that if she was launched today there would be anarchy. So she’ll just become smaller, but not ever go away. The career exploration has always been a good track, responsive to popular culture.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @2udb+Yg2UOI9

Yeah but to be fair, today people get outraged by things like the statement ‘Women Aren’t Men’ sooo...

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @1aqx+Yg2UOI9

This is so true. Mattel has systemically and toxically strengthened gender stereotypes for decades. It's an embarrassment, not a power brand. If Barbie was launched today people would be outraged.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @1ioi+Yg2UOI9

Barbie is the victim of its own making. In its effort to be everything to everyone it’s become as generic as Kleenex.

Definition of trying too hard. By the way I’ve never heard a kid say that their Barbie is too skinny. Now fat moms on the other hand...

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @nxd+Yg2UOI9

While I agree Barbie is not without controversy, in the larger landscape of toys for little girls with whatever marketing or media that is attached to it, haven’t you figured it out already?

Barbie is by far and away not the worst and actually attempts to tackle issues instead of just rolling out dolls that look like they belong in 1980’s Hollywood Blvd at night.

I have plenty to troll Mattel for, but this argument is mostly pointless. At the least there’s an effort of inclusion and general morals for parents to appreciate in Barbie. Check out some LOL Surprise marketing and tell me they didn’t dress up ten-ish year old girls like adults and sometimes a bit overboard if not inappropriate. Who can forget Bratz? Just because they had cartoonish heads doesn’t erase that they clearly had a street walker look to them.

Barbie isn’t the villain here. There are better reasons to be mad at her than this for Mattel employees.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @pwn+Yg2UOI9

Post a reply

: