Thread regarding McDermott International Inc. layoffs

Management commentary isn’t fooling the street Just laughing and laughing at the original post. Yes, Freeport is such an unqualified success tha

Errors by CBI and MDR management just keep compounding. If you listened to the earnings call and read the filings, then the decline in share price should come as no shock. The fundamentals of the acquisition of CBI were poor from day one, while the shoddy execution and legacy decisions continue to haunt.

MDR and Chiyoda putting out conflicting statements on Cameron reinforces the chaos around the projects and won’t help either company’s credibility.

The Golden Pass project has seen MDR’s SOW reduced to OSBL which from the street’s perspective means, “we don’t trust MDR not to gunk it up on-site.” Choosing not to bid on what once was a sole source project in Rio Grande - because terms couldn’t be worked out with Saipem - then trying to gloss over it on the earnings call didn’t fool anyone. Let’s not forget that former leaders on the Cameron project are leading the Rio Grande project and know better than most how ill equipped MDR is to execute on large scale LNG projects. That likely would have resulted in a rejected bid package and it costs money to put together bids - money MDR just doesn’t have (see publicly disclosed negative free cash flow.)

All of the uncertainty over the Anadarko merger means that any potential FID in Mozambique is further pushed out. Certainly the new owners will review the projects and gut check over whether MDR is the right company to build the project. MDR isn’t winning onshore EPC work in the US. That speaks volumes about owners’ lack of confidence in MDR. Keep watching the stock price - it’s a reflection of the true reality of the company.

by
| 1492 views | | 9 replies (last May 14, 2019) | Reply
Post ID: @OP+YXRFCim

9 replies (most recent on top)

One more for MDR.

https://www.lngworldnews.com/kbr-chosen-for-epc-work-on-freeport-lngs-train-4/

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @6bnw+YXRFCim

Wait until Ecopetrol (Reficar) gets done with you. That whole projects was a mess and Phil made away with millions.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @2qvt+YXRFCim

It's a shame that this site doesn't permit embedded links. MDR's message?

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zDAmPIq29ro

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @1mgb+YXRFCim

Not sure if it’s is a rookie mistake, but definitely a mistake for sure. His comments are purely to mitigate more stock price erosion and he is doing a spectacularly bad job at it.

I agree, that the last 10 percent is the toughest. Especially when the progress rules of credit are changed constantly. Worker slowdown, progress over stating, claims (and their way too optimistic settlement costs in the forecast!), a punch list that the client keeps adding and adding to, continued attrition of key people (workers, supervisors and project management), warranty costs.

But, the good news is DD has it all under control for Cameron and Freeport. Whose turn is it to get thrown under the bus next? Mark C,, you’re up!

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @1zyj+YXRFCim

DD's commentary is a rookie mistake . . .

Normally, the assessment of construction progress refers to the physical plant construction only. It is expressed in terms of percent of total facility installed and tested...as opposed to percent of total estimate expended. It usually excludes commissioning and related activities. Additional charges could emanate from cost overrun on remaining construction labor, commissioning costs, claims by subcontractors...among other sources. Further, given the labor market challenges already disclosed it wouldn’t be abnormal for productivity to deteriorate materially in the last 10 percent. Construction workforce’s are transient and often slow production during pendency of the next project to materialize.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @1bdz+YXRFCim

I'd imagine Next Decade was happy to see MDR decline to bid too. They accepted the Cameron bid knowing it was under-priced and risky. It wouldn't look good if it happened again.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @1sqc+YXRFCim

It has already started, wake up!

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @ftg+YXRFCim

Mcdermott continues to point at the legacy CB&I projects as the root cause for poor finical performance. Unfortunately other than the “cookie cutter”low tech projects in the Middle East none of the legacy MDR projects have been a finical success. He cost of non conformance has always been above industry norms. When mgt starts bragging about technical success it’s generally code for we lost money.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @zwy+YXRFCim

When does the death spiral begin? Do I need to start looking now?

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @xsg+YXRFCim

Post a reply

: