Gherson took over as HR chief in 2013, but in her 17 years at the company, she's seen plenty of
change. In 2014-15, IBM was facing "massive disruption," Gherson said, from a shift to the cloud
(where software is distributed online instead of through hardware), new AI and blockchain tech, and
accompanying new business models. This meant that many of its more than 350,000 employees
worldwide would need to adapt or be replaced.
"There's a limit to how much you can just sort of change out your workforce, right?" Gherson said.
"Particularly in a lot of countries where that's quite painful."
.
.
.
Instead of having managers work with each of their employees to map out their skills and then work
with other managers to see what skills were still needed, IBM automated the process. Internal software
could analyze employees' work experience and writings to infer what they excelled at. It prompted a
cultural shift within the company.
.
.
.
"It was the first time we realized, 'Wow, we don't have to let all these people go and go out and hire
people for these openings even though they don't have the background that you would normally look for
in the external market. They have the skills to be successful in these jobs,'" Gherson said.
So if the company believes it can re-train most of us to adapt rather than replace us, why do the massive RA's continue? And sounds like IBM doesn't really like the labor laws of those countries where it's difficult (nearly impossible in some countries) to easily RA employees.
And there's internal software analyzing our writings? So I guess all those blog posts and comments are being sc-aped, parsed, and analyzed by Watson (referred to as "internal software" in the article) and in support of this endeavor?
https://www.businessinsider.com/how-ibm-is-using-artificial-intelligence-to-retrain-workers-2019-4