Thread regarding Bank of New York Mellon Corp. layoffs

Was the WARN Act triggered by any of the notifications?

by
| 881 views | | 5 replies (last February 8, 2019) | Reply
Post ID: @OP+XqrVSjA

5 replies (most recent on top)

Thanks for the clarification. Does that mean that all impacted employees have received a minimum of 12 weeks of SUB regardless of tenure?

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @6qan+XqrVSjA

WARN is negated in situations where a company provides employees a SUB package equivalent to the 90 days. They have in effect, provided you with the proper notification by affording you salary and benefits for 90 days.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @5ump+XqrVSjA

Not sure of other locations but for New York:

Private sector employers in New York State that employ more than 50 are required to issue a WARN notice 90 days before closing a plant. They must also notify when there is a layoff that affects 33 percent of the workforce (at least 25 workers) or 250 workers from a single employment site. They must send the notice to employees, their representatives, the State Labor Department and local workforce investment partners.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @5rgo+XqrVSjA

Doubtful. Isn’t it 500 people at a site or more than a third of a site if it’s less than 500?

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @4kef+XqrVSjA

I have been wondering that as well. We’re enough people laid off to violate the WARN Act?

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @4lcs+XqrVSjA

Post a reply

: