I get the position of the creditors in the whole story. It's logical that it’s in their best interest to liquidate Sears and to get what they can of their money. I don’t blame them for that, but go that far and talk about how Eddie Lampert profited illegally from the downfall of Sears is a little two-faced. Don’t get me wrong, I thank that all of this is absolutely true and I don't like Eddie as much as the next guy doesn't, but stating this for me is like admitting to being an accomplice the crime. If the creditors knew something illegal was going on, why didn’t they alert the authorities? Also, Why the hell did they continue financing if they knew there was behavior that had the ability to directly limit sears in paying its debt off?
https://www.wsj.com/articles/creditors-say-edward-lampert-reaped-billions-but-left-sears-insolvent-11548364160