Thread regarding Sears layoffs

Ex-Sears CEO Eddie Lampert orchestrated 'scheme' to 'steal' Sears, creditors allege

https://amp.usatoday.com/amp/2667949002

Longtime Sears boss and investor Eddie Lampert orchestrated a "multiyear and multifaceted scheme" to strip the company of assets and capitalize on its decline, a group of the retailer's major creditors alleged.

Lampert, who remains chairman of Sears and was CEO until the company filed for Chapter 11 bankruptcy in October, presided over the closure of more than 3,500 stores and the loss of about 250,000 jobs, according to a scathing filing Wednesday by unsecured creditors.

The creditors are hoping to persuade a federal judge to force Sears to liquidate instead of accepting the latest offer by Lampert's hedge fund ESL Investments to keep a shrunken version of the company alive.

They took the unusual step of filing a 136-page history of what they called "Sears' tragic descent from giant to ghost."

Lampert "engaged in serial asset stripping" of the company after taking control in 2005 following the company's tie-up with Kmart, the creditors said. "Lampert was hopelessly conflicted as he presided over Sears' descent into insolvency and into a persistent state of liquidity crisis."

The creditors – a group that includes major mall owners such as Simon Property Group – also accused current Sears leaders of having "capitulated" to Lampert by allowing him to "steal the remaining assets" in a bankruptcy auction.

It's not unusual for unsecured creditors to protest a bankruptcy restructuring plan, which typically leads to steep losses for them. But this one comes after years of criticism by independent experts of Lampert's dealings.

by
| 755 views | | 5 replies (last January 25, 2019) | Reply
Post ID: @OP+XhjtpfQ

5 replies (most recent on top)

The creditors are also going to have to be very careful, especially any that extended loans after the SRG transaction.(ie, most of the unsecured creditors involved in this filing) By that point, SHC was clearly (to anyone looking) teetering on insolvency. If those loans were extended after that point, or even more after the low price Craftsman sold for spring 2016, (>90% of the loans in question) those creditors are going to be in trouble. The BK judge will overrule their objections with the reasoning that they should have done due diligence and realized the minefield they were entering. The other angle will be the shareholders of the creditors coming after them for malfeasance and failing to adequately assess the risk involved in the loans. This entire process is a slow-moving train wreck that get more interesting every day it goes on.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @1vmk+XhjtpfQ

That’s great and all but the unsecured creditors will gain nothing in a liquidation scenario because Eddie won’t end up footing legal bills for SHC so liquidation proceeds would end up paying the lawyers. They’re screwed regardless of the outcome.

Ultimately I think they’ll have to litigate it because it’s mostly hearsay until concrete numbers are proven. I still don’t think it’ll stand up in court either. It’s too long a period, too much has happened with the recession.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @1ogi+XhjtpfQ

It took years of planning and plotting to get to this... but who is willing to spend the time and money to uncover wrong doing if there is any ? The effort has to be worth the return.

The information is available in many different places.

https://www.secform4.com/filings/1310067/0000899243-18-032000.htm

But sifting and finding a criminal action that may not exist...

What if he was smart enough to game the system😡

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @sck+XhjtpfQ

I'm glad a lot of news outlets are now reporting the shady things Eddie and his ESL did with Sears.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @kfr+XhjtpfQ

Sounds about right to me

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @eji+XhjtpfQ

Post a reply

: