Thread regarding Thomson Reuters layoffs

Thomson Reuters- Canada/Kennedy office

Sadly people are finding out that the Editorial/Legal are all losing their supervisors. Some have found out before Christmas break during their review, some found out while being on workday and seeing they no longer report to a supervisor.

Most all supervisors will and are losing their jobs, a small few keeping their job but being demoted as a regular joe. This is in massive mess!

Some groups are being divided and having to report to new management in the US - seriously- can TR just rip off the damn bandaid and stop playing with these people’s lives.

No word from the leaders of this fiasco. Silence still! It’s disgusting what’s happening.

by
| 2651 views | | 11 replies (last January 28, 2019) | Reply
Post ID: @OP+WVVMshn

11 replies (most recent on top)

Remember when they were bringing 1500 tech jobs to Canada two years ago? LOL PM was up there at the Customer Centre on 29 and they were recruiting at Embner. Ember will be the next to go and the shlubs in Eagan make less so of course that is why. What a joke this company has become.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @qwad+WVVMshn

It's interesting that this was announced today for Analytical Content Operations. It was said in almost a casual way that several supervisors would no longer have people reporting to them. Lots of changes!

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @mkop+WVVMshn

So, with so many teams reporting into middle management positions in the US, what exactly does this say about TR's true commitment to Canada? What's more, what does it say about career development for Canadian employees? Move to Eagan if you want a promotion?

What an outstanding way to drain talent and run a whole national operation into the ground. Kudos to Mr. Smith and the executive team on showing both a lack of heart and a lack of brain.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @6foj+WVVMshn

Just a word about supervisors. I am one, but I’m a working supervisor, I do everything my reports do, plus I happen to do timesheets, and reports. I am very much a rower and I’m the one monitoring workflows, staying late and working weekends when my reports are leaving at 5 on the dot.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @5vwj+WVVMshn

Yes it's happening. It happen to my group and a few other groups. What's upsetting to me is TR has not announced this at all and it feels like we're just supposed to take this in silence. Thankfully I found out before reading this post ( just by a day). I agree with this post, let's rip this off like a band-aide and carry on already.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @5cvm+WVVMshn

Yes it’s happening. Not sure if they were all demoted or if some were given their notices

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @3bji+WVVMshn

I don't know if this rumour is really true. I have not heard a peep about it from any person other than from this anonymous source. Has anybody other than the original poster heard clues that this is happening?

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @2vib+WVVMshn

Less supervisors and more rowers is probably a positive development for TR

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @2cmq+WVVMshn

It’s disgusting!! I really hope Karma bites them in the butt. Well I know who to haunt when I pass on ... might end up there quicker with the way they have been handling this I am sure they had a very nice Christmas though.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @ruv+WVVMshn

"Flatttening"

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @fqb+WVVMshn

A Japanese company and a North American company decided to have a canoe race on the St. Lawrence River. Both teams practiced long and hard to reach their peak performance before the race.

On the big day, the Japanese won by a mile. The North Americans, very discouraged and depressed, decided to investigate the reason for the crushing defeat.

A management team made up of senior management was formed to investigate and recommend appropriate action. Their conclusion was the Japanese had 8 people rowing and 1 person steering, while the North American team had 8 people steering and 1 person rowing. So, North American management hired a consulting company and paid them a large amount of money for a second opinion.

They advised that too many people were steering the boat, while not enough people were rowing.

To prevent another loss to the Japanese, the rowing team’s management structure was totally reorganized to 4 steering supervisors, 3 area steering superintendents and 1 assistant superintendent steering manager. They also implemented a new performance system that would give the 1 person rowing the boat greater incentive to work harder.

It was called the ”Rowing Team Quality First Program“, with meetings, dinners and free pens for the rower. There was discussion of getting new paddles, canoes and other equipment, extra vacation days for practices, and bonuses.

The next year the Japanese won by two miles. Humiliated, the North American management laid off the rower for poor performance, halted development of a new canoe, sold the paddles, and canceled all capital investments in new equipment. The money saved was distributed to the Senior Executives as bonuses and the next year’s racing team was outsourced to India.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @rlj+WVVMshn

Post a reply

: