Thread regarding IBM layoffs

As new lawsuits heat up over age discrimination , IBM's reputation is at stake

http://www.latimes.com/business/la-fi-ibm-age-bias-20180919-story.html

by
| 1549 views | | 14 replies (last September 25, 2018) | Reply
Post ID: @OP+VfrDnoJ

14 replies (most recent on top)

5cui. So in the grand scheme of things what does this action tell you??? (spinoff, lay-off, re-education, a new business opportunity).

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @5tzs+VfrDnoJ

IBM's latest strategy is to transfer 100's of aged employees into a division where they have next to zero skills! Aug 1, 450 employees were moved from TSS to IS with no warnings!

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @5cui+VfrDnoJ

4pld,

Firing workers who cost more money is a perfectly legal action. It just so happens that the workers who cost more money happen to be older. But that doesn't make it illegal. Anytime you say the company is firing older people to cut costs, you are actually arguing in favor of the company.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @4mnv+VfrDnoJ

Yes - the jettison of older workers who cost more money is commonplace and the big corporations seem to get away with it. I'm shocked there arent more lawsuits, especially given that separated employees are forced to sign documents under duress for fear of losing whatever little benefit they are being offered.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @4pld+VfrDnoJ

Can we send all the technical work to India and still remain managers here?

Can I still keep my BMW and pretend to be important?

No and No according to Bain

goodby blue skies to all the wannabe managers

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @2khl+VfrDnoJ

It is ironic how many people over 50 at IBM are considered "outdated" and replaced by younger workers. Even after all of these layoffs and reshuffling, revenue has declined by over 20 billion dollars in the past 6 years. With all of this new talent shouldn't revenue be increasing by 20 billion? Is anyone able to explain how the board of directors who's average age is 65 is exempt from the age related RA mandate? Warren Buffet was right to sell most of his useless stock!

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @1rbg+VfrDnoJ

It is not just the RA'd people. Most over 50 and/or over 30 years are considered to have no "career potential" and therefore are not able to ever get a raise or promotion again. That is how IBM values current older employees with a great deal of experience. The criteria that enables a a even raise is sickening.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @1zkd+VfrDnoJ

Ironically to let go of their US Staff to replace with unskilled, outsourcing. When will they realize you end up paying 3 times as much for unskilled labor and lose your customers because you continue to f up.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @1nyi+VfrDnoJ

Indian infestation all levels, while replacing older Americans, what a deal......clean this ship, before it hits the iceberg, Rolf

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @1oss+VfrDnoJ

AWESOME, SUE THE MOITHEFUCKERS, MAKE THEM PAY- KARMA IS A B--ch!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @1svg+VfrDnoJ

What reputation? It's not 1998 anymore

Wells Fargo has a better reputation than IBM

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @1byv+VfrDnoJ

IBM is bleeding, they have made serious cuts to it's experienced workforce to replace it with cheaper less or unskilled labor.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @1etu+VfrDnoJ

The past two CEO's have done so much damage, I would not hire IBM to do anything,

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @1ggo+VfrDnoJ

What reputation?

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @1zrp+VfrDnoJ

Post a reply

: