Thread regarding IBM layoffs

IBM's $34B Red Hat deal is risky bid to boost cloud business

https://finance.yahoo.com/news/red-hat-soar-ibm-deal-134926659.html

Some of the comments hit the nail on the head

Gini is a terrible CEO. She just put the nail in the coffin of a roughly 100 year old company. This is a desperate move. They had a lead in the cloud business that they first lost to Amazon and then google, microsoft and others.

Warrent Buffett voted with his feet by buying and then not too long after selling the shares.

She came from IBM global services business where she was known to be RUTHLESS. She does not understand technology, IBM's customers or IBM's strength. Previous guy SAM was an accountant guy who made numbers by cutting costs...so the downward spiral started with Sam. The best IBM talent has left...for better upstart companies because Gini and Sam were cost focused - they cut salaries, benefits etc.

its only matter of time before Mainframe business starts eroding. Perhaps mainframe business will never ever go away due to incredible intrenchment and remains a cash cow, but Gini has LOADED IBM WITH HUGE DEBTS DOING STUPID SHARE BUYBACKS, that the debt load will now over whelm the mainframe's business to provide core strength to IBM. The Red-hot move was a stupid move, huge multiples paid ....I'd give it 10% chance of ever recovering the money paid. This is a desperate move.

A former IBMer.

When I worked at IBM they were spending billions on building put cloud data centers worldwide. Since that time I've not seen IBM even mentioned in articles about cloud in the general business press. Wall Street Journal, Barrons, IBD, etc. This is a SCATHING indictment of IBM marketing.When I worked at IBM they were spending billions on building put cloud data centers worldwide. Since that time I've not seen IBM even mentioned in articles about cloud in the general business press. Wall Street Journal, Barrons, IBD, etc. This is a SCATHING indictment of IBM marketing.

by
| 975 views | | 5 replies (last November 5, 2018) | Reply
Post ID: @OP+VZpMoEp

5 replies (most recent on top)

This will not go well. THINK about it. If you paid $34B for anything ... you're going to want to be involved and make changes ... and IBM has a track record of getting involved and messing things up. The lip service given by Red Hat's CEO Jim Whitehurst's to his employees is total BS: ... "Joining forces with IBM will provide us with a greater level of scale, resources and capabilities to accelerate the impact of open source as the basis for digital transformation and bring Red Hat to an even wider audience – all while preserving our unique culture and unwavering commitment to open source innovation" ... What he really means is: ... "Hang in there with me so I, and members of the Red Hat executive staff, are able to reach our buyout objectives and collect our money" ...

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @vhc+VZpMoEp

We are an IBM customer, we have already started talking about checking and reducing our Red Hat footprint because we know IBM will be swooping in for dishonest Red Hat audits soon enough.

This will be a big nothing burger for IBM, it's their reputation and pricing that s---s, not their mediocre products. What really stinks is they are going to destroy a good company.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @sju+VZpMoEp

Remember - Ginny can not be fired, IBM will not risk the bad PR by jettisoning a high profile female CEO. Look at Marissa Mayer, she literally destroyed yahoo, drove it right into the ground, and they would fire her.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @myn+VZpMoEp

"This is about resetting the cloud landscape," IBM Chairman and CEO Virginia Rometty said Monday in a conference call.

LOL. Poor AWS and Azure. They must be quaking in their boots right now.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @bbw+VZpMoEp

It really does smack of AOL - Time Warner, except the stupidity of this Red Hat acquisition is much more obvious to smart people than was the stupidity of AOL - Time Warner.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @nzk+VZpMoEp

Post a reply

: