It wasn't debated - it was just mentioned by the local MP in a Parliamentary question just so he can get a story in the local paper.
A few days later he was down to ask the British Prime Minister a high profile question at Prime Minister's Question Time. Did he raised the issue of his 300 constitutents losing their jobs or the recent communication he received from Thomson Reuters desperately appealing for help over changes to UK data laws? No, he went with free TV licences for old people.
The truth is Wrexham has closed because the staff earn £15,500 a year for a very skilled job (very cheap by UK levels for such a job.) whereas Bangalore can do it for probably much less than £7000 (without those pesky employment laws.) (Hope the clients don't want the same quality though! I am told the Bangalore quality is currently at around 40-60% against the 96%+ that is regularly met and exceeded in Wrexham.
I would also imagine Refinitiv may not have to deal with the same data laws coming in in the UK if they are based in India.
So ask why Refinitiv have closed Wrexham. 300 highly skilled workers gone to be replaced by staff in Bangalore who will produce a very poor quality product once the staff in Wrexham have stopped checking EVERY record they produce. When Wrexham are made redundant, it will be the blind leading the blind as Refinitiv charge top dollar for second rate products!