Thread regarding Schlumberger Ltd. layoffs

DELFI, One year later

More than 4 years ago, slb started to invest large amounts of time, people and money into new Digital Technologies. There was Bespin, BlueCube, the creation of SWT, Software Professional Careers and the STIC. AB felt like the Steve Ballmer of Slb. Exciting times.

The following years were a classic example of what happens when expectations are too high, vision too short and projects too slow: projects names changed (lift & shift, cirrus, ...), people stayed, MVPs made a lot of buzz but never saw the light of day and while the strategy concentrated on IT providers rather than on clients, the focus gradually shifted from lines of code to marketing slides. All the while, in a self-defense reflex, the organization become more autistic and less competent, priviledging loyalty over skills and self-prsise over critical thinking.

Eventually, DELFI, the culmination of all those efforts, was released one year ago in a grand, somptuous event.

One year is a long time in a fast-paced, digitally disrupted industry. Four years is an eternity in the world of Agile and DevOps.

Where do we stand now? Which new problems do we actually solve? Where is the revenue? And is it Slb revenue or is it Google's. What is the real potential? Could the stock-to-Brent ratio hint, in part, at the market's view on those issues?

How would a company stand if they started their digital journey now instead of 4 years ago? Did we gain or did we lose time and money while doing so?

Finally, is there any reason to be more optimistic about DELFI's second anniversary?

by
| 3421 views | | 6 replies (last September 22, 2018) | Reply
Post ID: @OP+V8ZrXob

6 replies (most recent on top)

DELFI is all marketing but no substance. nobody can explain what DELFI is. they will talk about environment, attributes etc and at the end of it you will have zero understanding of what DELFI is. but mgmt has huge dreams of making this a multiple 100M business.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @9osn+V8ZrXob

Many software engineers indeed consider DELFI as a training ground in the hope of finding a better job elsewhere or pepping up their CV. It might work Some product champions and managers clearly have the same target, but that's being delusional.

But the DELFI mess has little to do with the technology and much to do with the lack of vision of the people supposed to design it. When AI and ML leaders have a 6th grader understanding of these topics, subsurface managers only a vague knowledge of what E&P is about and when they keep pulling similar profiles behind them how could they come up with a commercially successful project?

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @6ltm+V8ZrXob

Delhi is a name of a joke

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @3abu+V8ZrXob

More waste of money pipe dreams from PK

What is he smoking up in his office?

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @2qab+V8ZrXob

Amen.

We (software engineers) at least got the opportunity to train on new technologies. The first ones to learn those are already long gone working in other companies.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @1ebb+V8ZrXob

Delfi was a baby who died before born.

Very true this is Google revenue, slb copied most of ideas from Google. There has been misunderstanding of applying technology to create a problem rather than using technology to fix old problem.

Sadly this is true, hope you guys made some money being involved in this project.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @aia+V8ZrXob

Post a reply

: