4frm. I believe the break up of services is based on strategic initiatives (cloud, AI/cognitive, as a service) vs everything else. The everything thing else are the old services contracts that have run their course and are due to be renewed. The IBM CFO said as much on the last earnings call. IBM India has been able to continue those contracts with new terms, due to their lower labor rates and the enhancement of the internet allowing offshoring. The problem with the new contracts is the profit margins are much less than IBM is used to demanding. As such, IBM has been running a race to the bottom of Sacrificing profit for slower growth revenue. Sooner or later something has to give!!! That’s the split of slower growing services (everything else) vs the faster growing services (strategic initiatives). Will the board allow this continuing???? Who knows they have been very patient with Ginni. I believe the owning institutions are demanding faster growth even if they have to split the company. THUS the Bain relationship. We are almost 2 years into the restructuring of IBM so the 60/20/20 rearrangement of the work force should just about be done so it’s now time for the sell off/ spinoff/ divorce of slower vs faster growth services. NOTE legacy HW continues on both models, so one division or the other will have to absorb the HW and sell to the other. I believe new IBM (faster growth) will continue on with System Z. System Z is as old as dirt, but it drives faster growth as the fortune 250 will never get off of Z, THUS more transformational services. What IBM does with Power Systems is a different story, as AIX and OS/400 are fading away quickly at the expense of LINUX. Will IBM keep Power as it drives AI/Cognative, or will IBM just farm the IP invested into Power, and let someone else build it???? Who knows, but IBM is definitely breaking up into faster growth and slower growth. Bain I believe will take the slower growth side of the house, and once acquired, cut deeply into the management team to harvest out cash flow and profitas there is no strategic management needed, BUT rather just operational/efficient management needed.