Was it back in 2013 when Mike asked the CSC folk worldwide what company did they want CSC to become? He was canvassing all staff opinions and offered to steer the company on a new and leading course.
Now, 5 years on, I may be wrong, but I don't remember any of us who were at the inaugural Lawrie meeting or those watching his roadshows offered anything remotely like the suggestion that we believe the company should, in five years time, be a total cluster f-ck!
I could be wrong. But I don't remember anyone asking for that at the time.
I also don't remember any of us suggesting that whole teams should be wiped out and replaced with offshore checklists or that the most technical, risk-laden projects should be distributed to untrained rookies in distant lands whose first time fix depended upon google working quick enough.
I also fail to recall anyone proposing that the way to foster a more collaborative and innovative, productive workforce would be to destroy people's lives: to consider people with 20, 30 yrs of loyalty and kick them out the door on one day's notice and escort them and their box of memories beyond the swipe-card access point and close the door without a 'thanks for all the dedication and loyalty you've shown the company over the years'.
I am almost certain I do not recall anyone suggesting that it might be a good idea if we P-ss off some lucrative clients to the point where they would place their trust in a competitor, nor do I recall any of the ideas on the blogs suggesting that the company should wrap up its delivery model in and idiotic and confusing operating model that would consume millions in consultancy only to be scrapped after 18 months and another idea tried out.
I don't recall suggesting that company success should be shared only by levels 1+2 and company failure should be dealt with by severe punishment of the workers and promotion of the useless management or even that reward and recognition should be small crumbs from the top table given to those who lips are unable to be surgically removed from a manager's posterior.
I think I would have remembered.
A year on and some are still here; many are not however. We have a new racing car team - whoo hoo!, but also quarter on quarter revenue declines and less onshore staff than a post office on a Saturday morning.
The word 'teams', in dxc, is reserved only for areas where more than one person remains. Such self elected groups have a lifespan of a mayfly. Given DXC is a mass of confusion and problems, then it is of little surprise that its biggest growth area is its Service Desk which is proud to contain an army of mindless drones, conditioned by flashing images on their morning monitor screens of DXC ticker-tape 'good news' regarding amazing 'successes' in Eurasia and requiring "your dedication, commitment' to brace against those evil headwinds threatening our way of life. 'Your continued hard work and dedication must continue to help your brave leaders at the top, feather their overly large nests; fatten their bellies to allow them to continue to step on those below.
Oh yes, Happy Birthday DXC!