https://youtu.be/ifZGlU4nj-g
6 replies (most recent on top)
Great video. I relate to what the presenter said about employees having a visceral hatred for their leaders. As I watch leaders such as AM, BN, CH, VY and GJ greedily feed from the trough while they slaughter excellent and long serving employees, I have a difficult time keeping my own visceral hatred of them under control. I wonder how they live with themselves.
Only certain VPs and directors are given the opportunity to receive “360 degree” feedback from individuals of their choice (these individuals may include selected peers, direct reports and others).
Other employees provide feedback about their levels of engagement through the Perspectives Survey, which Enbridge has theoretically agreed to administer every two years. In reality, the company only administers the survey when times are relatively good, as it doesn’t want to receive bad results.
Employees are also occasionally invited to participate in random pulse check surveys (Survey Monkey-like questionnaires), which may or may not be confidential.
Not sure about the confidential employee feedback. I have never been asked to provide such a thing for my director. but I am a bottom line worker so may only go to his direct reports, who likely won't stick their necks out.
Follow me Fools!
Enbridge gets awards as an employer for a number of things. One is “Confidential employee feedback” that states employees can also provide confidential feedback on their manager’s performance. What tool is used for this? How can confidentiality be guaranteed? Especially when specific feedback would likely identify evaluator.
Yeah I seen that one before. Our executive leaders do not have the power that derives from relationships. All they have is role power. Role power which is useless if people won’t follow you. Also based on how well things have gone I would say their expertise is in question. Have to keep in mind though that this is a service for profit company not a production company. With less maintenance and less projects there are naturally less people required. If you kept the people you would be chasing lower rates of return. Not necessarily a bad thing but evil corporations look out for shareholders and cut people first.