Ex-googlers who were transferred across to DXC from google are keeping their pay rate of 13.50 and are not fully trained, while long term experienced Tier 1 Tier 2 and even Tier 3 agents receive $10.50/hr...how can DXC justify paying HUGE wage increases to new inexperienced folks while short changing long term experienced agents?
5 replies (most recent on top)
It's all about PERFORMANCE METRICS and your SLA%,,,,,that's how the company makes or loses money..if your 13.50/hr person is poor performance low QAs etc, that is not good for the company, period...and then dxc turns around and keeps highly qualified top performing experienced paid lower wages doesn't make business sense....MORE work, MORE responsibilities= LOW pay...LESS work, less responsibility, poor performing , =HIGHER pay....doesn't add up.........
Whatever happened to the EEOC? Equal Employment Opportunity Commission?
come to terms with reality. the current management folks are the weinstein type
they are not paying you for tech skills, they are paying for youthfullness
who really wants to Fucck an old Ba$Tard, they are looking for fresh teens
look at the company for what it is not what it was.
Not sure on the comment that CSC never bothered to convert. I know for a fact when RMG people went over you could convert or was asked to convert to a CSC contract and there was a small reward. This made it easier and cheaper for CSC to manage you. However under TUPE they could not force it so it was down to the individual.
I didnt take it, yes I got a small reward if I switched contracts but my RMG T&C's were still much better. And thankfully I was proved right when I was made redundant last year as I was a lot better of financially via RMG' T&C's than if I had gone under CSC ones..
Used to happen in CSC a lot.
The company hired people at whatever rate with never any attempt to offer parity between roles. Quite the reverse really.
People in my team who did the same job as me had pay rates from half as much as me all the way up to double my pay - for the same skills, same roles.
Employees who came across in outsourcing deals usually retained their original terms from the client too. Because CSC HR was such a frikkin disaster they never bothered to convert those contracts to standard CSC ones ever.... which became a massive cost problem when Mikey starting axing people because some people they axed had 20+ years continuous service on a contract that promised 2 month's money for every year worked in the event of redundancy.