Thread regarding Windstream Corp. layoffs

A Vicious Cycle

I've personally witnessed the latest round (a couple weeks ago) get rid of guys that know more about the network than anyone else on the floor. These few that were let go were literally the subject matter experts that kept their associated groups working as they were & will definitely be missed. Sure, most of the laid off in general were probably the result of being the lowest quality/output employees (the lowest hanging fruit gets picked first), but these guys... man! They were definitely let go in order to make the biggest impact on the financials! The problem is that when they take our best techs/workers from us (just b/c they made the most $$) that makes our service levels go down, which increases churn, which further drives down the public interest in the company/brand, which lowers the stock, which causes the executives & board to want to cut more heads. Its a vicious cycle that BAFFLES ME that no one at the top sees this.

TT: Want to know how to fix our plunging stock?

  1. Bring back the F@#$% DIVIDEND. It was clearly the only reason any power-investors (think: the ones that make the stock price move in either direction) ever invested in Windstream. Windstream had one of the best dividends in the entire Exchange and it was never a "growth" company (at least as far as the stock's performance was concerned), but the company was heavily vested because of that beautiful dividend.

  2. Hire MORE, not reduce workforce. Sure, this will increase capEx due to overall cost of paying employees, but the return would be a better ability to handle the load of day to day operations, which increases our service levels, decreases churn, drives up the public interest, and ultimately increases the stock (think actual positive cash flow).

by
| 1841 views | | 6 replies (last February 12, 2018) | Reply
Post ID: @OP+RFfhWwt

6 replies (most recent on top)

As far as who..Unfortunately it's a favoritism thing. My lead...slept as his desk for hours even fell asleep during teams call, being paid in the sixties and is the lowest producer...l mean the lowest...the boss kept a BLIND eye on him even after numerous complaints...even HR got complaints...if he wasn't sleeping he was on the phone talking sports. ON TOP OF ALL THAT HE IS A BACKSTABBER..GUESS WHAT ..HIS BOSS GOT THE AXE, HIS BOSSES BOSS GOT THE AXE AND HE IS STILL THERE AND NOTHING HAS CHANGED STILL SLEEPING, STILL THE LOWEST PRODUCER, STILL EARNING IN THE SIXTIES, STILL THE LEAD, STILL ON PERSONAL CALLS ALL DAY, STILL NOT FULL ING LEAD DUTIES....SO NOW NEW HAS A BLIND EYE.....ALL ARE ATE UP WITH THE DUMB A--!!

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @2xti+RFfhWwt

"Sure, most of the laid off in general were probably the result of being the lowest quality/output employees (the lowest hanging fruit gets picked first),"

This is a stupid statement. Redundant ambiguous statements in the same sentence, great job there, chief. After this many layoffs anyone and everyone is on the list, regardless of your opinion of their work. Anyone that has been cut in the last year has been missed due to the reduction of manpower.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @hzr+RFfhWwt

$1.35 / share in aftermarket - sell sell sell!

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @tcd+RFfhWwt

You need to use Windstream’s education assistance and take a business class in college.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @tch+RFfhWwt

Fact

Fact

Fact

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @auh+RFfhWwt

A - no money to pay for a dividend

B - growth company ... verbiage used after a dividend cut to manipulate the share holders.

C - layoffs to tidy up balance sheet in order to get this pig up for sale.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @zkw+RFfhWwt

Post a reply

: