Thread regarding Seagate Technology Inc. layoffs

Did the Seagate deal going private involving Veritas & SilverLake Partners hurt the long term future?

The 2000 20-billion dollar deal looked like a great deal for Seagate. But, did it hurt the long term viability of Seagate by divesting interests in companies like SanDisk? YOU BE THE JUDGE.

"I think the value the shareholders are getting is pretty spectacular" -Steve Luczo

I don't think the SMT envision SanDisk as part of a long term strategic vision then involving SSD.

"...Silver Lake's group to pay about $2 billion cash for Seagate's core operations.

Veritas will issue a total of about 116 million shares to recover 128 million shares from Seagate as well as the aforementioned cash and Seagate's holdings of Gadzoox Networks, SanDisk, CVC and Dragon Systems, which was acquired by Lernout & Hauspie."

http://www.zdnet.com/article/seagate-to-go-private-in-20-billion-deal/

by
| 2481 views | | 4 replies (last August 22, 2017) | Reply
Post ID: @OP+OAUtsRY

4 replies (most recent on top)

I did really well with the going private move from Steve. That was a great move for me. 30,000 options made me more than 1/2 million dollars.. Loved it.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @jhxt+OAUtsRY

A common reason a company gives for going private is that a minority group of large shareholders want to give the executives (and friends/owners) more power to make major business decisions without having to answer to a horde of public stockholders and pubic stock watchdogs for risky business decisions. Sometimes it is a good thing, i.e. you have a rock star genius CEO running the show (and who wants to grow the company of course). Just have to wait and see whether Seagate is growing its business through funding R&D and evolving by offering new products into new markets or if they are more focused on mitigating disaster and working on things like exec parachutes. A few wall street articles seem to hint that the latter is probably the case from what I've read and the "tiger" ride will be over soon.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @bowd+OAUtsRY

You are quite a nice chap.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @5btg+OAUtsRY

Ummm, pretty much not, idiot.

Offloading Veritas was a stroke of genius. And SanDisk was posting consecutive loosing quarters. So I think management made the right decision at the time, given the available information at the time.

You can sit there in your 1980-vintage Lazyboy chair and make spot-on observations about what happened in the past, or you can get off your cellulite-ridden fat a-- and get a job. One less jerk on Unemployment will certainly help make America great again.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @eur+OAUtsRY

Post a reply

: