When is upper management going to read people's comments in news articles. The biggest them is people complaining about Target out of stocks in the store. So the new Restock initiative simply means...we don't have it in the store, so don't expect to get it shipped to your home either.
Whatever happened to the three top initiatives a couple of years ago: Instocks, Instocks, Instocks. I think if we solved this, we would have happy customers.
Notice how all the articles point to the fact that this is 3 years late and Amazon Pantry already has the upper hand. Nothing new about this and the stock is flat today.
OP is simply pointing out that 2 years ago, Mike Mulligan stated the top projects were 1. Instocks 2. Instocks and 3. Instocks. We have not yet solved this issue in the stores so how are our customers going to believe we can ship it to their home when we can't even keep the stores stocked properly.
We should fix the instock issue in the stores and that will make more customers happy instead of trying to please a small percentage with home delivery.
Related: my ????? Was in response to thIs thread, it's incoherent. I'm aware of the restock pilot and have read the article.
Link to the story in the StarTribune
http://www.startribune.com/target-restock-bringing-household-supplies-to-a-doorstep-near-you/421483203/
?????