Thread regarding Intel Corp. layoffs

Intel's recent contribution to "layoff technology"

2014 and prior -- Analysis of the need for, planning, and execution of layoff was an ordeal, with the 6+ months span fully visible to the employee base

2015 Q2 -- The time from when layoff rumors surfaced in the Oregonian through the stealth announcements to execution completion was a little over one month

2016 Q2 -- No word of (mass) layoffs appeared until the Q1 results meeting in mid-April. A week and a half later, in completing one of Intel's slimiest actions ever, several thousand employees had been perp-walked out the door.

~6 months to ~1 month to a week and a half -- sadly this is the only area within Intel where Moore's Law is still alive. One has to wonder what the next "process efficiency improvement" in this space will deliver.

by
| 2908 views | | 15 replies (last June 6, 2017) | Reply
Post ID: @OP+NDSJ0UB

15 replies (most recent on top)

"So if you get denied a $200 training, a $40 book purchase or a $400 business trip, even though these expenses are crucial for your work, then chances are that VSPs and ISPs are coming your way. "

Sbo - With one exception: it is always a good season to promote new VPs. Despite a smell of fear and death in the air, and no good news to share on any front, with even intern hires also frozen, we badly needed 15 new senior and corporate VPs. These people have to explain why they deserved this promotion at such a time.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @1gcw+NDSJ0UB

"They have proven that they are capable of persisting against difficult competition" ??

It is well-known that the Intel modem in Iphone 7, mostly designed by the ex-Infineon team, is inferior to the Qualcomm modem. Plenty of discussion, e.g.,

https://www.forbes.com/sites/aarontilley/2016/10/21/how-to-buy-iphone-7-intel-qualcomm-modem/#7e47f5386c79

https://www.theverge.com/2017/4/11/15255318/qualcomm-sues-apple-iphone-countersue-intel

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @1fli+NDSJ0UB

a) That was before Intel even entered negotiations to acquire Infineon's mobile business.

b) The mobile business was not contributing to Infineon's financial crisis at the time.

c) As it was said here: Infineon went almost bankrupt but managed to pull itself out of that with a stock price that had multiplied already before Intel acquired Infineon's mobile business. So I fail to see how anyone would manage to get anything negative about ex-Infineon engineers out of that. They have proven that they are capable of persisting against difficult competition, while the Intel CPU guys have been getting their asses whupped by ARM for many years now, and Intel still doesn't have a competitive mobile CPU on the market or in the roadmaps.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @1jjx+NDSJ0UB

https://www.ft.com/content/194c2c28-b442-11df-8208-00144feabdc0

http://www.eetimes.com/document.asp?doc_id=1263998

Quote,

"Infineon, which came back from the brink of bankruptcy last year,..."

"Infineon may not have to resort to bankruptcy protection to clear the debts threatening the chip vendor's stability."

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @1xdw+NDSJ0UB

Huh? Infineon went nearly bankrupt? When the mobile business unit was bought by Intel, it was making profits. The story behind the acquisition is common knowledge. Why do people still spread b---s---?

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @1kee+NDSJ0UB

Infineon sold 4k people at the time. Miraculously, iCDG headcount was close to 10k. See what I mean?

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @qdb+NDSJ0UB

@jlj. I disagree, I know plenty of iCDG engineers that were originally from Infineon.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @lkg+NDSJ0UB

The ex-Infineon team is a minority in iCDG. After more than 6 years inside Intel and all the restructurings there's no Infineon left for you to bash.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @jlj+NDSJ0UB

@NDSJ0UB-yqh: at least Intel was convinced that Infineon wireless is worth a billion $. And that was years before BK.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @pxs+NDSJ0UB

The real incompetence in iCDG is the entire ex-Infineon team. Infineon didn't go almost bankrupt without reasons.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @yqh+NDSJ0UB

BK wake up and desire it is time and hat afternoon they are walked. He can't deliver Moore's Law faster but he can't deliver Layoffs faster

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @fks+NDSJ0UB

Based on that logic, iCDG should be gone already, because we have had a budget crisis in that business unit for the last five years, with management being unable to get it under control and to present a solid budget that does not cause another spending freeze in the middle of the fiscal year.

People always whine how Aicha was such a terrible manager, when the real incompetence in iCDG is in the finance department. Five years of constant budget crisis and those dorks still have their jobs.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @gbc+NDSJ0UB

Coming layoffs are rather easy to predict. When there is a hiring and spending freeze in an area of the company, then there is an 80 to 90% chance that layoffs follow. That's the way it was for EVERY layoff so far. So if you get denied a $200 training, a $40 book purchase or a $400 business trip, even though these expenses are crucial for your work, then chances are that VSPs and ISPs are coming your way. That is just the way it is at Intel.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @sbo+NDSJ0UB

Yet, in 2014/15/16 we knew about it months ahead - you just had to follow this forum

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @rcu+NDSJ0UB

Well said.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @fao+NDSJ0UB

Post a reply

: