Share who you think has been WORSER for Intel of the former and current CEO.
11 replies (most recent on top)
Craig Barrett was pretty bad. He thought the gravy train would just run by itself until AMD passed us by. PO at least got us technical leadership back but then cost us Billion$$ in fines and lawsuits. No accountability.
PSO got an IR!
BK is on track for IR next year as all his fad chasing yields nothing and the ARMy beats him everywhere
https://www.fool.com/investing/2017/03/20/is-management-really-to-blame-for-intel-corporatio.aspx
MrFwdr6-1nkc : where have you been? Majority of intel employees do not have English as a first language.
Mooly. Splinter. Gelsinger. Maloney. Perlmutter. Skaugen (who Stevenson just went to work for).
Opportunities lost. Just think of how each of them would attack the current systemic issues.
We should have paid attention when Mooly left.
Wish some of you would learn English grammar and spelling. Is English not your first language?
BK will get $hit can likely next year as the debacle 10nm results in wholesale product rejuggle again. Likely a few TMG and LTD will be fired with him.
Finances and future will be so bleak that no qualified external will want to be the white knight, so Intel will get another internal, best hope will be Murthy, sadly, as no lifer is thinking straight these days
Oh those were the days... PSO was CEO when Intel was a money printing machine. An ape could have been CEO. How "where are my lots??" Brian became CEO is beyond me.
Could have asked who was better and not embarrassed yourself, Mr Troll.
PSO was smart and arrogant, to sure of himself and dogmatic x86 and we all now how that went.
BK, crazy hard working and passionate, but simply not smart enough and too dumb and quick like a fish on bait chasing hot fad. Like I said no IQ.
Both were mistakes, Splinter or Gelsinger should have been the one groomed after Andy.
You are troll!