Thread regarding ConocoPhillips layoffs

Opinions on if this is true....I heard that COP is laying off up to 270 finance people in Bartlesville over the next year.

by
| 1931 views | | 9 replies (last May 11, 2017) | Reply
Post ID: @OP+MU71S7v

9 replies (most recent on top)

You guys do realize that not all supervisors are paid more than analysts, right? Becoming a supervisor does not necessarily mean more money.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @ktdt+MU71S7v

With the overhead of Supervisors and Directors in Bartlesville...This would the place to start to reorg BVL.. Save some money with these pricey people..

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @5gdy+MU71S7v

Don't worry, you are all going to get your turn.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @5vao+MU71S7v

Just to be curious, I wonder how may Supervisors or Directors will be lost in the 170.

Supervisors with 4 to 5 people and Directors with 2 supervisors with 4 to 5 people...

Seems like this has to stop at some point..

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @3iir+MU71S7v

According to an article from KOTV news in Tulsa from 2016, there were 1,400 in Bartlesville. In that article it said they will cut 90 from Bartlesville.

Now in 2017 they announce 170 cuts in Bartlesville.....at least that is so far the public announcement.

Doesn't leave many survivors. Here's Wishing the good employees the best.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @1lpm+MU71S7v

How many employees left in Bartlesville?

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @1ojq+MU71S7v

What will determine the number of Bartlesville layoffs in second round? Will it be asset sales that determine this or will it just be half the number of the remaining employees?

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @1dyj+MU71S7v

Wow that seems high and doesn't really

Leave many in Bartlesville. Plus that means

They expect everyone to worry/stress about their jobs until then... that seems kinda of

Cruel.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @jir+MU71S7v

The number of first group is 300+ and timing is October 2017. Second round in March 2018 with remainder at closure in June 2018.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @dan+MU71S7v

Post a reply

: