Thread regarding IBM layoffs

Why the cover up?

Have you noticed that layoffs are being hidden? That's exactly why this site exists, because we all know corporations are hiding the true extent of the layoffs.

The reason why is political, and surprising.

We are entering a recession, a severe recession. And all recessions must be blamed on a scapegoat.

Remember the "It was Bush's fault meme" when Obama took office?

Everything was blamed on Bush. And for the record, I dont care who's in office, so don't start freaking out about your Red or Blue favorite puppet.

This recession will be blamed on Trump and the Republicans, as all recessions are blamed on Republicans. Yep, go check it out, you'll see it's true.

Obama did the damage with massive debts and crazy policies, and now that is coming home to roost. But it cannot be blamed on Obama or the Democrats.

Enter the layoffs.

These layoffs are happening because the recession has started, but the scapegoat has not been named yet. That scapegoat will be Trump.

Trump will soon cause a trade war with pretty much the whole world, as he's scripted to do. That will be the thing the media blames for the recession.

But in reality, the recession is here because it is due. But the public must not figure that out. They must be led to believe Trump did it.

Always, there must be a scapegoat.

by
| 1086 views | | 2 replies (last April 3, 2017) | Reply
Post ID: @OP+MAahtEx

2 replies (most recent on top)

@Buckwheat - you nailed it.

Solved it in the first sentence...

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @2zfe+MAahtEx

The observation that "we're headed for a recession" is posted somewhere on the internet every hour or so for the last 20 years. Eventually, the poster will be correct; then they crow like that obnoxious cat that sits on your fence all night.

Sure, it'll be Bush's fault, and Obama's fault (with emphasis on that one), Clinton's fault, and of course Trumps fault too.

But the problem itself isn't so broad and easy to predict as "we're all gonna die." The problem is that IBM is failing rapidly, and will cease to exist in short order. Like so many other fat corps that were built by the 60-70's generation that have failed like IBM.

The type-G personalities (G for Greed) move in to scrape off the $billions of cash that get loosened up when the coffers get raided. The Wall Streeters always follow some leader because they're typically incapable of doing their own research. In this case it's Warren.

Ginny has no idea what IBM does, or how it does it. She could have been just as good at selling shoes or plumbing supplies. Like Carley and a few others, she was pushed up into the ranks because she's a woman. This is a very chic and in-vogue move that makes for good talk at parties and fundraisers. Top it off with a dozen or so hardcore lobbyists who show up in DC with briefcases stuffed with $2mil each, and we have a recipe for success. For them.

We minions, however, just suffer. When Ginny talks to the press, she doesn't mention the 400k people working for IBM. Nor their working conditions. She just talks about Wall St, the board, some nonsense about the company's direction she was told to speak to, and herself.

IBM will drop down to some level of insignificance in the next year or so, then it'll be bought out by some company that may have no interest whatsoever in IT. Ginny, making roughly $41mil/year since 2010, is quite comfy. As is the board. And the media continue to ignore IBM as they understandably don't know how to cover it. Can IBM really be this corrupt, rotten and treacherous? Dang, if they report it like that, it'd be like blasting the USA. Wait - IBM is America's company isn't it? It's not? That's a very uneasy feeling if you're not working for IBM. If you work[ed] for IBM, then you've already come to terms with it. Your butt has been sore for 2 dozen years and nobody believes you. You, you, whiner you.

As a good IBM employee, you never really had a good job when you think back on it. The C levels intentionally made the place inconceivably hostile. Otherwise worthless middle managers, those placed due to their PhD etc, swaggered their way into quickly firing 229,000 people since 2009. And these are the types of people that enjoyed doing it. These middle managers like to see your facial expression, and hear your voice when you are fired. They get off on it. But they were trained for this by IBM.

I was devastated when I was fired (RA'd) a few years ago. However, I was picked up rather quickly by a good sized aerospace company and have been grinning from ear-ear ever since. Even get raises. And a bonus. And my boss smiles. I didn't spend 25 years cowering when my boss comes into my office.

The same thing will happen to you, as a fired IBMer, unless you let yourself slide down into management at IBM. If not, you'll soon realize the RA-day was the happiest day in your life.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @2mnn+MAahtEx

Post a reply

: