...according to our store manager at this morning's rally meeting. Yep, it's official. PAs and credit are paramount in profitability and keeping a store open (that is until corporate decides to axe a whole bunch of stores, even stores that are doing "well" not only in PAs and credit, but sales).
Is this a threat tactic? Personally, I'm not worried...this is just an in-between job for me until I move on to bigger and better things. If the store closes, if the company folds, I'll be fine. But for others, does the "leadership" of Sears really believe that it can "whip" its employees into shape by implying that the store will close (taking their jobs with it) if associates don't get enough PAs and credit?
Another tactic that has come up: performance-based scheduling. Associates that aren't getting PAs and credit will be facing fewer hours than those that are. There are a lot of associates that aren't necessarily "high performers" in the way Sears wants them to be but are otherwise an asset to the company with their customer service, attendance, etc. This seems to be taken under consideration no longer.
I've noticed that some (but not all) of the "high performing" associates tend to badger customers, maybe even be a little deceptive to achieve the numbers. Some of them also believe that they are not replaceable and show up late, call out, break the rules, etc. That can't be good for Sears in the long term. Of course, that's not the case with all high performers, but we have a few at my store that are like this.