Tsk, tsk. Still at it dude? Just can’t get it thru your head that visa holders aren’t part of an elaborate anti-American conspiracy to save the company money? Well, it’s a fact, they aren’t. At the risk of triggering your envy/resentment further let me elaborate on an earlier comment in this post regarding expat compensation: oil expats typically cost significantly more than a local employee, not less. In addition to their base compensation they also get paid a foreign service premium (a bonus), cost of living allowance, car and housing allowances, home leave expenses, foreign tax equalization, education benefits for their kids, etc, etc, etc. Add to that the cost of HR overhead and visa expenses and they are way, way, WAY more costly than local employees. Individual cases may vary, but a quick guess would be 2X+. The same applies to Americans going overseas with certain foreign locations paying even more. Oil expats in Africa, the Middle East or Southeast Asia often pay foreign service premiums that by themselves are 45-65% of base pay. Those locations typically add on company paid security and domestic staffs too.
Why then, given the high cost of expats, are companies like Marathon willing to pay extra for these employees? Because the people making the decisions, rightly or wrongly, believe the folks selected for foreign assignments are key to the companies survival and growth. They are generally long-term employees (geos and engineers mostly), often with unique basin knowledge, skill-sets and technical expertise and have proven their value to the company. You may disagree with management’s decision to do this and you may disagree with who they selected, but then this is a capitalistic company not a democracy and hence you don’t get a vote do you?
Fume all you want about the practice. Perhaps doing so will make you feel less helpless, temporarily. But remember this: the number of expats compared to total US staffing are relative small. Plus, the company has documented their personnel decisions out the wazoo; they are conforming to the law and will defend their decisions vigorously.
So here’s where you come back with something like: “The H1-B people are bad and the prez is going to change the law and bring back American jobs!” No, he’s not. It’s been well documented that he employees H1-B visa holders in his own businesses. He’s not going to damage his company despite his… ahem… pledge to place it in a “blind” trust. But OK, just for the sake of argument, lets say he does sign an executive order revoking H1-B visas or get’s congress to do it him. What then? Will MOC get rid of all those “Europeans” you’re prejudiced against and happy days will return for you? Not likely. Most of those folks won’t be adversely affected. Some have been here long enough that they are now permanent residents, even citizens. They won’t be going anywhere. The ones that do have to leave won’t be let go either; they’ll simply get transferred back overseas, to populate a new technology center or swap jobs with their foreign posted US counterparts. Management handpicked these people, they’re key employees, remember? Net oil jobs added? Zero. Money saved? Questionable. Huge waste of time.
We all want to see a healthy job market in this industry. That will only happen when oil prices return to a sustainable and profitable level. That won’t take place until the supply glut is gone. That is fact. Meanwhile, your whining about mythical hoards of cheap foreign H1-B visa holders stealing American oil jobs truly sounds desperate, like a person with “little drive” and a desire for a “socialist entitlement” state.