Thread regarding Intel Corp. layoffs

Human Assets vs Hunger Games

The Intel annual review process is one of the most toxic programs at Intel and is a key contributor to the malaise going on at the corporation today. There are more companies, for example https://finance.yahoo.com/news/amazon-promises-change-hunger-games-190252111.html , realizing you cannot turn the workplace into an "every man for himself" environment. Companies must tap the entire pool of human capital. The Jack Welch approach to stack ranking becomes more and more outdated as more and more of us "old timers" are leaving the work-force.

After 22 years in FSM Engineering, I was one of the fortunate ones to be offered ERP and got out in June. I spent my entire career as an IC. Intel was once a great company ..... sadly, not today. I could write pages about "then" and "now" but have more fun things to do....

by
| 956 views | | 1 reply (November 16, 2016) | Reply
Post ID: @OP+Kn1j9Lw

1 reply

Of course you can do the "every man for himself" thing, but then you have to pay accordingly. Apple for example has a highly competitive culture, but when you win the competition, you get a huge bonus. At Intel you get sh-- for being the best. What does an EE get you? A 4% raise instead of a 2% raise. Woohoo!

(All my EEs got me was that they locked me out of the VSPs, which I would have loved to get. I actually would have earned more for sh--ty performance. Amazing.)

So ultimately, the competitive culture at Intel only helps to demotivate, because being the best only "protects" you, but it doesn't really yield any tangible benefits.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @1gyp+Kn1j9Lw

Post a reply

: