Thread regarding Intel Corp. layoffs

Why can't intel recovery like Qualcomm https://www.semiwiki.com/forum/content/6077-qualcomm-back-top-soc-world.html

I always thought Intel's strength was the ability to face turmoil and competition with vigor and react and win.

But these days all I see are strange layoffs with no underlying strategy.

New products on 14nm, WTF, why 14nm when 10nm is where things should be.

Watches that are wrist warmers

New modems for the fruit company, but they aren't designed nor manufactured by Intel.

Strategic initiatives into commodity arena that has many stronger and entrenched players.

What has happened to the great, talented and fast Intel of the past? One that could identify and attacked with vigor and great world class products?

by
| 1035 views | | 4 replies (last August 14, 2016) | Reply
Post ID: @OP+ISWSDCn

4 replies (most recent on top)

The strategy is "survival" as technology shifts to less hardware and the average consumer says good bye to the pc. Mergers and acquisitions will be the way to sustain themselves for a bit longer until and if tech companies are able to redefine their futures. Microsoft has as you know and Amazon is leading the pack in the way tech works as a whole.

Every tech company is facing this same reality if you haven't noticed on the rest of every other tech layoff page. Sad state and many many jobs will be lost as a result. It will impact graduates and universities with STEM programs as well. This is a huge deal.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @tat+ISWSDCn

I basicly agree, lots of jobs require 2 or 4 yr average degree, these should be casual/contract jobs. Do the work shut up, here is 70k a year. 5% of these ppl make it to professional level.

No prof staff unless tier 1 school with Masters or higher source recurit on a global basis, 75% either move up or out. It's the Google, FB and other model, it has to be ruthless you better be brillant or get out. Don't bring your ex spouse or kids issue drugs to work. Take 90 days off fix your life I need you to produce not be your social worker

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @ggh+ISWSDCn

@smq, the top 1000 people would make 2mm a year everyone else average wages. Very few people above 45 years old. This works since Intel is basicly a high end factory. You need small group for new products. It's where America is going, and it's not fun for most of us

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @wex+ISWSDCn

Intel is way too big, most people over paid by 25%

High level fire 30% of staff, most people have average jobs with average skills

Cut salaries 20%, pay top performers 50 to 100% bonuses no more than 7% of staff

Move 70% of jobs to Asia Malysia, India US staff must work rotate thru India to get promoted

Bring average age in company to 34 max

We need a high level of meritocracy ps this is GS, McKinsey model and it works you basicly have 3 year contractrenewing contracts

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @smq+ISWSDCn

Post a reply

: