Thread regarding Intel Corp. layoffs

For you oldsters - Intel is Boog Powell - read to see my POV

I think that one thing that is lost on everyone is not the layoffs or Intel's incompetent management, but our basic philosophy and the philosophy of much of American High Tech.

In the 60s every baseball team had a Boog Powell; the guy who struck out lots but when he connected put the ball in the upper deck. Such a guy while frustrating was valuable - that is if you had singles hitters to set him up.

Intel has had 2 massive Grand Slams in it's history: the PC and server/database. They've made the company rich and given most of us good jobs.

But in our pursuit of the 3rd Grand Slam we have spent billions and ended up looking like fools. And as much as I dislike him, it's not just BK. Wall Street is waiting for the next Intel homer. So is all of American business. And so are most Intel employees. But the fact is old Boog struck out 10 times for every homer he hit. It's a poor model if you aren't also scoring with singles.

The truth is Intel has created plenty of singles products. I work for such a division; a solid single that makes 500+ million every year, with a good profit. And we currently expect to get dismantled. We're a profitable single in a company that does not want singles.

So what does Intel do? Trades the singles hitters or tries to make the single hitter into a home run hitter, which is impossible.

I sense that while most of you dislike management, you also are disappointed that we haven't discovered the next 10 billion dollar biz. Remember we can hit 1 homer or get 10 singles and still end up with a ton of money.

Management won't go that route; it listens to bean counters and Wall Street. And this is the reason, more than another other, that Intel might fail. There are no more grand slams at Intel.

by
| 1513 views | | 10 replies (last May 23, 2016) | Reply
Post ID: @OP+HweK1QJ

10 replies (most recent on top)

It was a good decade.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @1wdm+HweK1QJ

The problem with a company made of one trick pony which is a new generation of x86 aligned with a new generation of silicon that is supposed to offer more performance/watt and smaller etc. etc. is that those little singles can't move the needle much. That is the problem with companies like Google, MS, Apple etc. Every company that rides a single product to success is faced with how to replicate it to continue to grow.

So those little singles while viable for small companies simply get lost, deprioritized, or restructured and killed to move resources to the big home run hopes. It takes a superior management with great discipline and system to effective manage a lot of single hitters in baseball as well as in business and BK and the hatchet man have already showed they aren't capable.

The larger problem is that the tick-tock x86 model is now run out of steam and the next generation silicon hasn't shown up on schedule. It is now tick - tock - tick tick all on the same generation as the next generation silicon is so late that wheels have completely fallen off the car.

If anything the management team needs a lot of singles as the cleanup hitter is on injured reserve and unable to play, LOL

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @1dsi+HweK1QJ

Yep, nailed it. Swinging wildly at bad pitches. Those remaining are merely arranging the deck chairs on the Titanic.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @uvw+HweK1QJ

@xfn is a wise man

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @zsk+HweK1QJ

Real players like Powell's are being fired and they are being replaced with fat layer of management, incompetence is being promoted at all levels. PC is declining and their server market will be cannibalized by others like ARM. Management knows this and sees no future, they are now just in it for short term gain, look at Murthy's package. To layoff 12k and that's just the start, is a real act of desperation. To have the next big home run or similar number of singles, you need leadership and top talent at high levels. If you find them at Intel, let us know.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @xfn+HweK1QJ

So the lack of leadership at Intel is not the fault of the leaders, it's Wall Street?

Uh huh. Sure.

I agree that we try for home runs. But we've missed several of them that good leadership would have nailed out of the park. Now it seems like we're swinging the bat wildly in every direction, hoping the ball randomly hits it. Drones, charging bowls, shirt buttons, smart homes, etc. And our CEO is demoing these with stuff like BMX stuntmen or "dancing" robots. I think he'd rather be a Hollywood insider than a tech CEO.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @phs+HweK1QJ

Strike One: Apple leaves Intel

Strike Two: TSMC gets to 10nm and 7nm first

Strike Three: Google leaves Intel Server Processors for ARM based servers

That's a strike out all on it's own and the list isn't complete. Shareholders are to blame for allowing BK and his cronies to stay in charge.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @nov+HweK1QJ

If you fire all the Powell's who going to hit the home runs. The first swing you miss at Intel you're a gonna

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @rve+HweK1QJ

A

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @nuh+HweK1QJ

Nicely said!

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @ssv+HweK1QJ

Post a reply

: