Thread regarding Intel Corp. layoffs

Clearly Murthy was a board hire to bring this business under control

BK frantically repositioning defensively to halt Murthy power. Why else would you keep Aicha on board?

by
| 2752 views | | 13 replies (last May 18, 2016) | Reply
Post ID: @OP+Hr8Bet4

13 replies (most recent on top)

It was a two man contest to lead Qualcomm. Murthy lost (or was not chosen)...and chose to move on vs. taking another job at Qualcomm.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @1lcy+Hr8Bet4

Quote from http://www.recode.net/2015/11/20/11620848/ex-qualcomm-executive-murthy-renduchintala-lands-new-gig-at-intel

"Qualcomm announced Thursday that it was naming Cristiano Amon as sole head of the chip business and that Renduchintala was leaving.

The decision to promote Amon was made more than a month ago, but Qualcomm held off announcing it while Renduchintala debated whether to exit or take another role at Qualcomm, according to a source familiar with the situation.

Qualcomm essentially confirmed that in a statement. “A few months ago we made the decision to move away from a co-president leadership structure for QCT,” the company said. “Cristiano Amon was the clear choice as president of the chipset business. … Murthy was offered another role within Qualcomm, but he chose to leave the company instead.” "

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @1bbj+Hr8Bet4

Internal coup by HR Lawyers and the board.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @1mji+Hr8Bet4

When Q announced murthy was not the choice for qct president.. Within a couple of days the PR came from intel about him joining intel and his new role..

Since the offer and position in intel could not have been created in a couple of days it leads me to beleive that he left on his own accord, and the single president decision in Q was made likely after he informed then he was leaving.

Likely he must have been courtwd for weeks or months ahead of time

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @1lcu+Hr8Bet4

"Murthy left Qualcomm because he was passed over for the CEO job".

This is not true. He used to be the co-president of QCT, when Q moved to single president he was ousted. The press release from Q mentioned the other guy was always their first choice, hinted that Murthy did a bad job there. In fact when Murthy departed, Q did not thank him for his 10 years of service.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @apv+Hr8Bet4

Was it aicha, BK, or the board that suggested/approved the billion dollar loss each quarter ?

Back then aicha was 3? Mgr levels below ceo, I don't think she had the power to approve such a strategy

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @nkw+Hr8Bet4

Yes: "All non PC/Server CPU investments in Intel's history have failed. ALL."

The skills needed to succeed in these new areas are just not in the current Intel DNA...and the people with the skills - usually hired from elsewhere - are purged from the system by those in Intel who are too arrogant and ignorant to listen to others.

And the cycle repeats itself.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @jdq+Hr8Bet4

You need to fight black magic with black magic

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @deu+Hr8Bet4

wvf - Great example, let me expand on it... All non PC/Server CPU investments in Intel's history have failed. ALL. They all would have been better invested in the stock market. New investments should have at ~10% rate of success - they are high risk yes, but there should be some big winners. ALL of Intel's have failed. A company that has 100% failures and yet keeps trying: "Insanity: doing the same thing over and over again and expecting different results." - Albert Einstein

Escape the asylum and leave Intel.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @zhq+Hr8Bet4

Murthy left Qualcomm because he was passed over for the CEO job. And now he wants revenge.

He was brought on as the hatchet man. First inserted between BK and the VPs who previously reported to him. And next to start cutting programs, sites and employees to please Wall Street. He's an experienced hire in this area.

Read that Aicha left / quit. Then was brought back. Clearly for PR and not for performance reasons.

Intel is in disarray and will be for the foreseeable future. Its problems are both structural and cultural. Neither BK nor Murthy are the leaders who have the vision or skills to guide Intel to its next generation of success or to root out the deep dysfunctions in the culture.

In my short time at Intel, I have seen just about everyone who had a good head on their shoulders quit or get pushed out. The ones who remain are primarily skilled at playing the Intel game and networking to get resources for their pet projects...or just suffering in the dysfunction.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @wvf+Hr8Bet4

The board needs to go the distance and dump BK now.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @iqc+Hr8Bet4

Round 2 is BK and Murthy. We just started round 1

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @jvi+Hr8Bet4

Why else keep Acha at all? Obvious failure. She would have done better putting the $10B in the stock market. Instead he pissed it away with er lousy decision making. Rightfully she should have been fired and never given option to be rehired just like all the first time SSL4 receivers this year.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @xdm+Hr8Bet4

Post a reply

: