Thread regarding Intel Corp. layoffs

Why none of the executives are not resigning after this much of loss? They just say "We own that wrong decision".

by
| 1357 views | | 6 replies (last May 14, 2016) | Reply
Post ID: @OP+HnjilVO

6 replies (most recent on top)

But is Doug Davis gone?

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @1bxe+HnjilVO

Really, you haven't noticed that 1/2 of MCM has left since BK took over?

Good grief, you should be walked out.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @uka+HnjilVO

agree with @trw - Execs know the plan at least a quarter in advance, so when you see Execs suddenly leaving to "pursue other interests", that's your queue that something big is about to happen with h/c reductions. Those execs are leaving because either they don't agree with the company direction, or they don't want the stress of facing the layoff and they simply don't want to be a part of the action. Also, they leave before any of the announcements citing "layoff due to performance" and are insulated when looking for new positions elsewhere because they can technically say, "I left before the layoffs began".

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @wex+HnjilVO

Doug Davis, Kirk Skaughen are some publicly known exits courtesy Murthy. But otherwise the question is valid. While foot soldiers are publicly walked out, why aren't grade 9+ managers? Especially double digit graded ones.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @yvh+HnjilVO

These execs will never admit to their own failures. They will blame the failed execution of their plans on others.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @zkp+HnjilVO

Several Execs already left before the layoff. Right before. I am guessing it was due to the fact they didn't agree with the "plan". This dawned on me when BK announced the layoffs and said all execs agree. Yeah. That's because anybody who didn't got the boot or quit.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @trw+HnjilVO

Post a reply

: