Thread regarding Intel Corp. layoffs

At our QGS our managers (inc Murthy) said it will all be OK. We just need to get our products properly defined an onto the market on time ...

QGS? - I'll never understand why the previous acronym - BUM - needed to change.

by
| 2132 views | | 6 replies (last May 7, 2016) | Reply
Post ID: @OP+Hg216IV

6 replies (most recent on top)

There are no headcount changes if they hire the same number they let go

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @1nrw+Hg216IV

Yes, he said the virtuous cycle of layoffs and sheetheads rising to the top is unstoppable.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @1xwd+Hg216IV

Defining our products and move it to market on time..........sounds a little vague if you ask me.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @1cuv+Hg216IV

Of course they will not tell you the bad news in these meetings since they risk an all out riot. By nature managers are good liers.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @qwc+Hg216IV

Yes and bk said at the start of the year no planned headcount changes.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @nup+Hg216IV

That would put the Imperiousness of our ips in jeopardy.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @mgw+Hg216IV

Post a reply

: